Once Again, Dalton folds in a big game

[Kevinicus]

Dak didn't choke...ever...during his playoff games played. Romo did...except for the 2014 playoff loss at Green Bay. I still feel he should have thrown the safer pass to a wide open Beasley underneath than to a riskier well covered Dez Bryant who was known to drop the pass at times.

Wow, the random idiotic dodge to Romo. Just completely out of nowhere.

Seriously, you need to let your obsessions go. Both Dak and Romo. It's not healthy.

 

[CowboysFaninHouston]

So...every sack was blamed on Dak?

So...the offensive lines were equivalent?

Your argument doesn't seem to have legs.

I am using the same standard of argument as Dak haters...they have said on many occasions Dak takes too many sacks....so I said Dalton takes too many sacks...

I am using what they used...and now I am being told I am wrong..

is there a different standard of measure for Dak vs. other QBs?

 

[ShaneFalco]

and you admire his porn stash

Hey man, grow it if you can. The dude beat Dallas with it. And he’s a slightly better version of Dak.

 

[America's Cowboy]

I didn’t praise Dalton. He was Plummeresque.
Like always. I just see that Dak is the same player. Which is why they have identical 1st 4 seasons careers and this season their numbers are also identical.

Unbelievable.

 

[America's Cowboy]

Hey man, grow it if you can. The dude beat Dallas with it. And he’s a slightly better version of Dak.

 

[CowboysFaninHouston]

Hey man, grow it if you can. The dude beat Dallas with it. And he’s a slightly better version of Dak.

he beat dallas with Porn? you seem to be a closet Dallas Hater...since Plummer retired in 2006 and you keep mentioning he beat Dallas.....what does that era Dallas and Plummer have to do with today's Dallas?

you are very confused dude. you have porn on our mind. perhaps put the porn away for a couple of minutes.

 

[Direwolf63]

So the oline had nothing to do with the loss, receivers dropping passes, the defense not being able to stop Giants receivers, a Head Coach not challenging a play, an offensive coordinator that didn't call a balanced game......I mean these are the same things I hear when another QB losses a game so it's only fair they be looked at for Dalton too.

But Dak gets none of these excuses when he loses a game. It's all on him.

 

[ShaneFalco]

I am using the same standard of argument as Dak haters...they have said on many occasions Dak takes too many sacks....so I said Dalton takes too many sacks...

I am using what they used...and now I am being told I am wrong..

is there a different standard of measure for Dak vs. other QBs?

Apparently yes. He got franchised and “elite” QBs get what he wanted.

 

[CowboysFaninHouston]

But Dak gets none of these excuses when he loses a game. It's all on him.

like they said....all wins and losses are on the QB, except if they are not named Dak....

 

[Kevinicus]

I am using the same standard of argument as Dak haters...they have said on many occasions Dak takes too many sacks....so I said Dalton takes too many sacks...

I am using what they used...and now I am being told I am wrong..

is there a different standard of measure for Dak vs. other QBs?

There is a difference between taking too many sacks, and having horrible protection. You understand this, correct? When someone says they take too many sacks, they're not talking about all of their sacks. They're talking about plays where they hold the ball too long, have poor pocket awareness, or - a Dak favorite - running out of bounds behind the line of scrimmage. They're not talking about when the rushers come free, or the pocket collapses quickly.

 

[CowboysFaninHouston]

Apparently yes. He got franchised and “elite” QBs get what he wanted.

what does getting franchised have to do with how you measure QBs

you are very very confused.....

 

[CowboysFaninHouston]

There is a difference between taking too many sacks, and having horrible protection. You understand this, correct? When someone says they take too many sacks, they're not talking about all of their sacks. They're talking about plays where they hold the ball too long, have poor pocket awareness, or - a Dak favorite - running out of bounds behind the line of scrimmage. They're not talking about when the rushers come free, or the pocket collapses quickly.

oh, believe me, I fully understand that. argued that, but was told I am wrong....so I went along with their standard in measuring Dalton...with that said, Dalton did hold the ball too long on several of the sacks yesterday.....Dalton was awful yesterday. it started with him and it ended with him. badly.

 

[Praxit]

..keep Gilbert, he is cheap and has good QB swagger. I call it natural confidence.

 

[Batman1980]

64.9%, 2169 yards, 14 TDs, 8 INTs, 87.3 RTG. ran for 114 yards and 0 TDs.
68%, 1856 yards, 9 TDs, 4 INTs, 99.6 RTG. ran for 93 yards and 3 TDs.

I'll let you guess which player is which but I know which one I'm writing a check to and which one I'm escorting out of the building.

 

[Kevinicus]

But Dak gets none of these excuses when he loses a game. It's all on him.

It's never all on anyone.

Are you new to Dak? He's had nothing but excuses for 4+ years. And he's been given accolades for team successes.

Team wins? Good stats? Dak is AMAZING!!!!!

Team struggles to score? Team loses? Interceptions? Fumbles? Etc? Not Dak's fault.

 

[ShaneFalco]

he beat dallas with Porn? you seem to be a closet Dallas Hater...since Plummer retired in 2006 and you keep mentioning he beat Dallas.....what does that era Dallas and Plummer have to do with today's Dallas?

you are very confused dude. you have porn on our mind. perhaps put the porn away for a couple of minutes.

Why am I closet hater for simply pointing out history.
Plummer beat Dallas with a porn stash.
Dak is a Jake Plummer level QB. Which is why he was franchised. I’m sorry these facts makes you feel “small”.

 

[Kevinicus]

oh, believe me, I fully understand that. argued that, but was told I am wrong....so I went along with their standard in measuring Dalton...with that said, Dalton did hold the ball too long on several of the sacks yesterday.....Dalton was awful yesterday. it started with him and it ended with him. badly.

He was pretty bad in the first half, but he was pretty damn effective in the 2nd half (and really towards the end of the first half too).

 

[America's Cowboy]

I am using the same standard of argument as Dak haters...they have said on many occasions Dak takes too many sacks....so I said Dalton takes too many sacks...

I am using what they used...and now I am being told I am wrong..

is there a different standard of measure for Dak vs. other QBs?

Of course there is a different standard used around here by some, bro. They are not worth arguing with. You could make them rewatch video proof or even beat them with a bat, you still couldn't make them admit they are wrong. They are like an Alabama tick stuck on a horse's sack. They are dug in until you squish them apart with a pair of pliers. lol

 

[Batman1980]

He was pretty bad in the first half, but he was pretty damn effective in the 2nd half (and really towards the end of the first half too).

Yeah that 0 TDs, 6 sacks and 1 INT sure sold me. Where do I sign to have him replace Rayne Dakota Prescott as the Cowboys' franchise QB for the next 10 years?

 

[CowboysFaninHouston]

Why am I closet hater for simply pointing out history.
Plummer beat Dallas with a porn stash.
Dak is a Jake Plummer level QB. Which is why he was franchised. I’m sorry these facts makes you feel “small”.

you keep harping on plummer (hmmm) and him beating a dallas team that has ZERO players on the current team or totally irrelevant to todays team.

I can recite irrelevant history as well.