Verdict
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 26,250
- Reaction score
- 20,540
I agree that giving him a large value long term contract would have been a worse mistake. I’m “for” keeping him at a lower cap number. Just not at the franchise tag number.OK, look at it from a different angle.
Schultz is a proven pass catcher, the only proven TE on the roster.
Why would you think it a mistake to pay him for one year while the rooks acclimate? A long term contract would've been a mistake, yes.
Schultz can’t even sniff a top 5 performance level. I just see what Schultz bringing to the table as easily replaceable for a lot less money. We have two more on the roster just like him, just without the playing time or cap number.