Doomsday101
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 107,762
- Reaction score
- 39,034
viman96;3598891 said:What does last season have to do with anything this year?
Results from last season do play a role in the rankings along with returning starters.
viman96;3598891 said:What does last season have to do with anything this year?
Doomsday101;3598886 said:I doubt the WAC offical is making it up, but none the less when Boise has faced top teams they have won and if they continue to win they will once again get a chance to play a BCS game
Hoofbite;3598672 said:They've played more ranked teams than Oregon has.
Likely will finish the season that way as well.
But let me guess, VT doesn't count for Boise and Tennessee is so much better than a ranked Oregon St.
In short, you're saying Boise should be ranked less because their upcoming schedule isnt too tough? Not on what they have done as of now but what is likely to happen in the future?
Good, sound reasoning.
Dallas;3598897 said:Nobody is talking any BCS game in this thread. It's about the NC game, which they won't sniff this year unless Bama or Oregon drop 1 which I don't see happening.
CATCH17;3598856 said:Boise State offered to pay their own way to any top ten team to play at that team's stadium. No one responded. Since SEC teams regularly pay 500k for cupcakes, what do they have to lose by having a team come to THEIR stadium and pay their own way, and not demand a home and home format?
Doomsday101;3598902 said:Being ranked at #4 they are in the running If Bama and Ohio St run the table then they likely with be in the championship game but every year teams fall. So I'm not writing any of these teams out.
Dallas;3598909 said:I don't see Bama losing to anyone and I don't see Oregon losing to anyone. I am on the fence w/ OSU, they still have a pretty tough schedule left, not that Oregon doesn't, Im just far more impressed w/ Oregon atm.
switzersflask;3598945 said:A playoff would be the worst thing in the world for Boise.
Can you imagine an 8-team playoff with the likes of Alabama, Ohio State, Oregon, Oklahoma, Nebraska, etc.?
Boise may get lucky and upset someone in the first round, but I just don't see them driving through a playoff laced with traditional powers.
Doomsday101;3598953 said:Maybe so maybe not. Today’s college football is a bit different since schools have been limited in scholarship they can award meaning there is allot more talent out there going to some of these smaller schools.
No matter how you cut it any team out there wants the chance and a playoff gives them a chance to prove it where it counts which is on the field.
Doomsday101;3598953 said:Maybe so maybe not. Today’s college football is a bit different since schools have been limited in scholarship they can award meaning there is allot more talent out there going to some of these smaller schools.
No matter how you cut it any team out there wants the chance and a playoff gives them a chance to prove it where it counts which is on the field.
switzersflask;3598960 said:I know what you're saying, but schools like UT, OU, Bama, and Florida still pull twice the talent that schools like Boise do.
Boise plays with a lot of heart, and a lot of bs on their schedule. If that makes sense lol.. 60% of the time, it works, every time.
Dallas;3598963 said:I just don't see your argument. Who cares about the number of scholarships avail. It all comes down to recruiting. When has BS ever cracked the top 50 recruiting classes?
Have they ever?
Dallas;3598963 said:I just don't see your argument. Who cares about the number of scholarships avail. It all comes down to recruiting. When has BS ever cracked the top 50 recruiting classes?
Have they ever?
Doomsday101;3598970 said:I agree the big schools still get the bigger names but this notion the worst thing for Boise is a playoff system? Come on the worst things is going undefeated knowing you will never get a chance to play in the NC game that would suck for anyone who loves to compete and I'm sure the kids at Boise love to compete and have done very well when given the chance to play top teams.
You could be right and they would not last in a playoff but at least they would go in knowing that if they can win then no one could take the NC away from them. Easiest way to say it I would rather lose on the field of play than in the data base of a computer.
switzersflask;3598973 said:Exactly. They may have the same amount of schollies as everyone else, but you have to actually get players to come to your school.
When it comes down to it, a traditional power will always have the upper hand when battling it out with Boise to get a 5-star recruit.
Doomsday101;3598974 said:It matters because some very good talent that in past years would be stowed away on bigger team, now are out there playing and in the case of Boise doing it very well. If I recall they took down the Sooners in the BCS game so don't act like they can't win they have when given the chance.
switzersflask;3598978 said:Obviously it would be better for them to have a shot, but they would get murdered in a playoff. But as you say, better than being left out, but that's what happens when you play nobody and compete in a horrible, horrible conference.
They need to do everything in their power to persuade the Pac 10 to let them join the conference. Once they get rid of that bs turf, they may have a chance at a BCS conference. lol
Doomsday101;3598974 said:It matters because some very good talent that in past years would be stowed away on bigger team, now are out there playing and in the case of Boise doing it very well. If I recall they took down the Sooners in the BCS game so don't act like they can't win they have when given the chance.
Doomsday101;3598985 said:That is your opinion but games are won on the field not in news papers or fans opinion and sure as hell are not won in computer programs. Lastly you once again act like they have a big choice of who they play they have evidently asked for these games and not getting much response. Yet teams like UTEP have no problem getting games with the so call power house