RedRaiderCowboysFan;2785356 said:
So you know that romo is more narcissistic then Owens? You reject his correct definition of romo because your definition of what you want romo to be is completely emotion driven and lacking in football insight or understanding. Being an administrator doesnt make you the all knowing of football or what you want to believe about romo is the truth. So many think romo is good because of his stats, well I wont be surprised if/when TO has the last laugh when romo is if not the leage leader in interceptions or at the top of that list and the touchdowns decrease dramatically and this team wins 6 or 7 games maybe.
romo is so full of himself, he actually beleives he doesnt need TO to look good and has most everyone thinking that as well, but it was only because he had TO that he and every other qb hes played with had their best seasons. He might be an ***, but that doesnt take away from the talent he is and that he is a hall of fame player. Without Owens to make romo look good, romo will probably implode and his teammates and every naive romo fan there is might start to see just how truly pathetic he is. But most will probably never admit it because that would have to admit they were wrong and not many people are big enough to do that.
Its a shame so many people have settled for romo and become romo fans instead of Cowboys fans. So when romo finally gets the boot, will everyone jump ship and rationilize and say its not his fault he could never get it done and go buy a romo jersey for the team he is on next, or conitnue to say whoever is a Cowboy just has to the best simply because they are on the team? And anybody who tries to argue against the point im making, your the exact kind of person Im talking about.
Holy cow. I already have a nickname for this post. Swiss cheese because it is so full of holes.
Let's start with the nonsense about me being an Administrator and what this means that I know. On the forum I'm not an Administrator, nor are the Mods Moderators. We are Cowboys fans expressing our opinions. I didn't post and say, "this is true because I am an administrator on this forum. Bow to me peasants." You're the self conscious paranoid who apparently has trouble with the fact that a volunteer staff member would dare to share an opinion that is contrary to what someone else would think. That isn't my problem. How you deal with the fact that I volunteer here is your problem.
Romo is more narcissistic and full of himself than Terrell "I Love Me Some Me" Owens? That one is a beauty. Upon what do you base that hunk of screed? Oh wait, I already know. He can bag babes that you can't. Hate to tell you this, but Owens has bagged some celebrity significant others a time or two himself. Apparently the difference is he can't get any who want the relationship to last. What drives women away from successful, good looking, wealthy men more than any other issue. Usually it is when a man is consumed with himself. The very essence of Narcissus. That describes iFlower the Wide Receiver more than any Quarterback in NFL History.
I have no football understanding? I have forgotten more about the game of football than you will ever know and I honestly have not forgotten that much. Be that as it may, let's forget that for one minute and focus on Tony Romo, the subject of your ill guided derision. Let me begin by saying I did not start out as a Tony Romo fan. Ask anyone on this forum who has known me for the 7 years I have been posting. I am a football pedigree, classic pocket passer purest. What that means, (since I doubt you have any clue) is that I will take a big armed, classic drop back passer with pocket pressence and some kind of QB or NFL pedigree over any other style of QB.
Does that definition fit Tony Romo? No it doesn't. The closest it gets for me that Tony Romo had a QB pedigree is that he comes from the same Alma Mater as Sean Payton and Mike Shanahan. Romo is a gunslinger, a scrambler, and in my opinion he does not have a strong arm. His arm is adequate. I do not consider him to have one of the strongest arms in the NFL. I never have. I can show you posts from a pre-season game where I saw him play live before he ever got his starting chance if you doubt this.
Point blank, very few posters on this forum had more doubt about Tony Romo than I had in the beginning. I confess that openly and without shame. You want to know why? Because I am not now, nor have I ever been, afraid of being wrong about a football opinion. On Tony Romo I was most assuredly wrong. He completes a high percentage of his passes. He throws for incredible amounts of yardage and for a lot of TDs. He escapes pressure and makes plays happen when most QBs would be sacked and the refs spotting the ball while the Defense celebrates. He wins football games.
You and the other know nothing Romo critics all spew the same bile. "Forget the stats. Forget the stats." You're all like parrots of each other with that silly mantra. Newsflash! Football is about stats. I hate to break that to the lot of you and burst your myopic bubbles of stupidity but it is the truth.
How do I define Tony Romo? It certainly isn't the bile driven way you do and it isn't even the bile driven way that you accuse me of. The reason for that is that you simply don't have a good enough grasp of the game to know how anyone can view the game as levels of gray instead of black and white.
For the record, I view Tony Romo as one of the top QBs in the NFL talent wise. And isn't it freaking hilarious how the NFL experts all agree with me and not you and your cabal of "Romo is the devil" nonsense talking, bile spewing, Owens worshipping cohorts?
I believe he needs to continue to develop. He needs to cut down on mistakes. He needs to take this team farther than he has so far and he needs to win in the post season. I view him as very synonymous of a QB named Peyton Manning who faced much of the same criticisms as Romo until he finally got all the pieces together.
I think it is beyond moronic that some posters sit there and talk about the past as if it has anything to do with the future. Romo has failed in the past so that means the future is set in stone. I would say more about this mantra you guys spew but "beyond moronic" pretty much covers it. The same things said about Peyton Manning and Steve Young and John Elway and other QBs of the past and will be said about talented QBs in the future. They can't win when it counts. Then when they do, the stupid mantra changes. Like the man said, you can't fix stupid, but stupid sure thinks it is a genius that others should pay heed to.
I sit back and wonder how the stories will change if Romo rises above your feeble grasp of the game to accomplish what many believe he can and you, in your glorious ignorance have said is quite impossible. While you struggle to curtail the perception that your alligator mouth overrode your mosquito *** my take on Tony Romo will have remained constant and level headed. One of the most talented QBs in the NFL. The only difference will be the monkey off his back acclimation.
Try not to strip your gears as you figure out how to spin control your way around the cheese you cut in that post. I hope you can stomach the smell.
