Pacman cloud

[Boysboy]

My health? What are you talking about?

Yes I will go root for another team ok?

Don't get me wrong-you ARE one of the voices of reasons on this board. I've been pretty critical of this team myself too.

My pt was that if you know the outcome of our season already, then what's the point in rooting for this team this year anyways?

 

[xWraithx]

Batman doesn't care what you think.

 

[Seven]

Again-Ed Johnson's lost has really shot their run D to ****. Sure, Bob Sanders' injury has likely but a dent in it, but now other teams are just gashing them in the middle of their DL with EASE.

One, two, schmoo, whatever...Ed Johnson's loss has been SIGNIFICANT to them. No way of spinning it.

B.S. You couldn't be more wrong. That run d last year was great when Sanders returned. Ed who? Now that we're completely off the subject........


You claimed there were a number of athlete issues. Implying a heck of a lot more than 2.

 

[Boysboy]

B.S. You couldn't be more wrong. That run d last year was great when Sanders returned. Ed who? Now that we're completely off the subject........


You claimed there were a number of athlete issues. Implying a heck of a lot more than 2.

Actually-that was 2 years ago when Sanders' return to the lineup greatly improved their run D. For the most part, losing their DTs Monte Raeger in a freak car accident and Corey Simon b/c he lost desire to play football hurt them tremendously throughout much of that year more than anything else. With Sanders, they weren't exactly GREAT, but they were GOOD(which was good ENOUGH in that playoff stretch).

Last year-Ed Johnson(Bob Sanders or no) made a SPLASH at DT. He turned out to be a much better run stuffer than the Colts anticipated.

Again-no ifs, ands, or buts...Johnson's loss has been a big blow to the Colts D as well.

 

[Seven]

Actually-that was 2 years ago when Sanders' return to the lineup greatly improved their run D. For the most part, losing their DTs Monte Raeger in a freak car accident and Corey Simon b/c he lost desire to play football hurt them tremendously throughout much of that year more than anything else. With Sanders, they weren't exactly GREAT, but they were GOOD(which was good ENOUGH in that playoff stretch).

Last year-Ed Johnson(Bob Sanders or no) made a SPLASH at DT. He turned out to be a much better run stuffer than the Colts anticipated.

Again-no ifs, ands, or buts...Johnson's loss has been a big blow to the Colts D as well.

Sucks getting older............if I could only remember where I put my glasses.......................


Can't comment on Johnson. Never saw him play and never heard his name called out.

 

[Boysboy]

Sucks getting older............if I could only remember where I put my glasses.......................

OK-did you even see the AFC Title game AND the Super Bowl? Yes, they were much improved with Sanders in there, but they were nonetheless giving up yards on the ground(you take out that long Thomas Jones run, the Bears were still averaging 4 yds/carry). Without Sanders in there, it would have been some 7 yds/carry.

IF they had Raeger and Simon throughout the season, the run D would have been dominant.

BTW-please read my entire post(before you start cherry-picking), OK?

 

[lockster]

Am I the only one that thinks that when you watch football, we are there to watch great football and not choir boys. I say let them out of prison if necessary on Sunday. It seems too many ppl on here are way too HYPOCRITACAL on here. Have you ever got a ticket for anything? That's a criminal offense and makes you a crimimal. Ever got in trouble in anyway. Then stop busting everyone's chops that play football. You're not perfect and neither are they. If you got punished for all your wrongs you wouldn't have a job either!! Kills me listening to all those of you blind to your own faults always wanting to cast that first stone. If a person does something out of football it should be punished outside of football.

 

[Disturbed]

If they are thugs they should be thrown in jail if warranted. And banned from the NFL.

Clean up the NFL. It is an honor to play in this league, and it should not foster bad character people.

 

[Disturbed]

As far as Pacman goes, he has not been very impressive this year. As a returner he has been below average and as a corner he has been beaten regularly. No great loss at this point.

Both rookies are performing better. Scandrick and Jenkins can pick up the defensive duties and probably do a better job. And we have several guys who can be a returner...

 

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Money isn't everything.

Yeah but sure is a heck of a lot better than sanctimonious people judging based on Mike Tirico from their sofa. It got old a long long time ago. Just watch the game and shut the heck up.

I guess it makes some people feel better about themselves but its just a sad sad thing.

 

[FuzzyLumpkins]

As far as Pacman goes, he has not been very impressive this year. As a returner he has been below average and as a corner he has been beaten regularly. No great loss at this point.

Both rookies are performing better. Scandrick and Jenkins can pick up the defensive duties and probably do a better job. And we have several guys who can be a returner...

He was easily the best corner on the field last week. the guy makes plays.

 

[Boysboy]

He was easily the best corner on the field last week. the guy makes plays.

His only problem is that he can't even catch a cold for now. First couple of games, he couldn't cover well. Last couple of games, his coverage improved dramatically, but he still has alot of work to do with his hands.

Hopefully, THAT will correct itself in the coming weeks.

 

[Seven]

Sucks getting older............if I could only remember where I put my glasses.......................


Can't comment on Johnson. Never saw him play and never heard his name called out.

OK-did you even see the AFC Title game AND the Super Bowl? Yes, they were much improved with Sanders in there, but they were nonetheless giving up yards on the ground(you take out that long Thomas Jones run, the Bears were still averaging 4 yds/carry). Without Sanders in there, it would have been some 7 yds/carry.

IF they had Raeger and Simon throughout the season, the run D would have been dominant.

BTW-please read my entire post(before you start cherry-picking), OK?

Dude. The part in bold was in reference to me not remembering that Sanders was out 2 years ago..................Settle down, now. I wasn't cherry picking anything.

 

[DallasEast]

Interesting thread. Thanks for posting.

 

[Mash]

Pacman? Low risk? He hasn't been here 3 months and he's already "tussling" with his body guard?


Where the hell you been?

What is the risk? so he got in a heat discussion with his body guard....big deal...

Thats why Jerry had those provisions in the trade deal......if he gets suspended we get a draft pick out of it.....

I dont understand where the big risk is........like I said....its a low risk.....please explain how its a hig risk?

Just want your thoughts on why

 

[Rudy]

I don't think anyone was complaining when we were winning Super Bowls with these types of characters.

 

[Boysboy]

I don't think anyone was complaining when we were winning Super Bowls with these types of characters.

Didn't the Giants win the Super Bowl last year with all those explosive personalities on that team? Yes-even WITHOUT Tiki and Shockey, there's still a bunch of those types on that team(i.e. Burress and Pierce being 2 of them).

Or how about the Chargers and their explosive personalities? Didn't they reach the AFC Title game despite having an uber-cupcake coach?

 

[28 Joker]

He was easily the best corner on the field last week. the guy makes plays.

Good point.

Here are Pacman's stats (for the 2 road games) according to Vela.

@ Cleveland

6 attempts 2 completions 20 yards 3.3 YPA 1 pass defensed 1 penalty

@ Green Bay

10 attempts 5 completions 41 yards 4.1 YPA 1 pass defensed 1 forced

fumble/recovery (returned for about 25 yards if I recall right)

If teams keep throwing at Pacman, they are going to pay for it. He will start catching those passes. I've seen him do it.

 

[Seven]

What is the risk? so he got in a heat discussion with his body guard....big deal...

Thats why Jerry had those provisions in the trade deal......if he gets suspended we get a draft pick out of it.....

I dont understand where the big risk is........like I said....its a low risk.....please explain how its a hig risk?

Just want your thoughts on why

Heated discussion? You KNOW it was more than that.


When the house is burnt to the ground...............feel free to call it a campfire.

 

[burmafrd]

Certainly it was a scuffle. BUT that is not all that either.
It was not a to the death cage match.