Pacman faces two felony charges

[tunahelper]

Sorry if a repost

DA in Las Vegas has filed charges

Link:

http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/wcStory?contentId=6524422&storyNumber=1&MSNHPHMA

FOXSports.com
Posted: 11 minutes ago
Suspended NFL player Adam "Pacman" Jones will face two felony charges in a strip club melee that preceded a triple shooting in February, Las Vegas police and the Clark County District Attorney's office said Wednesday.

I hope he receives justice!

 

[5Stars]

I hope he receives justice!

Oh...he will! One way or the other, justice will be served! He may not like it, or he might like it...and others may not like it, or maybe they will...but he will get his due! Watch and see...

 

[Vintage]

And who is "Huyghue", Vintage??

Why, he's Pac-Man's ATTORNEY... and lo and behold, he's trying his case in the MEDIA...

And you accept what he says without question??

No.

If he came out and said PacMan wasn't guilty of anything, it wouldn't mean anything to me.

But saying the DNA test came back negative (and all I am talking is about the DNA test, not the entirety of the case) I would tend to take that more credibly, seeing as how that is something that can easily be proven wrong as soon as the case starts.

 

[Mr Cowboy]

I went back and re-read the articles and couldn''t find where Pacman was charged with felony biting.....................

So why all this talk about DNA from a bite mark?

 

[fortdick]

I went back and re-read the articles and couldn''t find where Pacman was charged with felony biting.....................

So why all this talk about DNA from a bite mark?

It is an obfuscation by the Pacman apologists. They want to take something that is nothing and use it to say he is a good guy.

 

[justbob]

No.

If he came out and said PacMan wasn't guilty of anything, it wouldn't mean anything to me.

But saying the DNA test came back negative (and all I am talking is about the DNA test, not the entirety of the case) I would tend to take that more credibly, seeing as how that is something that can easily be proven wrong as soon as the case starts.

A defense attorney saying a dna test is negative can be translated into many differant things --the dna report could said that there was not enough dna evidence to make a determination-----It could have said there was no other dna present (not unlikely since the victim was living and his sweat would have diluted the dna --there are several other possibilities. A lawyer's slant to the news will be there is no dna because that looks the best for his client in the basically uninformed publics eye

 

[5Stars]

A lawyer's slant to the news will be there is no dna because that looks the best for his client in the basically uninformed publics eye

 

[kevwun]

These charges are based on something Pacman allegedly said. DNA in no way pertains to that.

 

[speedkilz88]

Photo of the bouncer PacMan allegedly bit:

Photo of the cop PacMan allegedly bit:

 

[Stash]

No, I wouldn't. They tend to want unbiased opinions.

And you consider yourself 'unbiased'?


Bwaaaaaaaaahhhhhhaaaaaaahhhhhhaaaaaahhhhhhhaaaaaaa!!!!!!

:laugh2:

 

[theogt]

And you consider yourself 'unbiased'?


Bwaaaaaaaaahhhhhhaaaaaaahhhhhhaaaaaahhhhhhhaaaaaaa!!!!!!

:laugh2:

My entire stance is that I don't know the facts and can't come to a conclusion one way or the other until I know the facts. I'm pretty sure that's the definition of unbiased. Is it not?

 

[Stash]

My entire stance is that I don't know the facts and can't come to a conclusion one way or the other until I know the facts. I'm pretty sure that's the definition of unbiased. Is it not?

You're an excuse-maker for a known scumbag.

At least have the guts to make a stand.

You want to cast your lot with a guy like Pacman Jones?

Fine.

At least have the guts to do it rather than hiding under the guise of 'unbiased'.

Again, I don't care if he's acquitted on this one or not, he's still a first class scumbag.

At least I have the guts to say it.

 

[theogt]

You're an excuse-maker for a known scumbag.

What excuse have I made?

At least have the guts to make a stand.

Wouldn't that make be biased?

You want to cast your lot with a guy like Pacman Jones?

No.

At least have the guts to do it rather than hiding under the guise of 'unbiased'.

Huh? Are you telling me I can't be unbiased?

Again, I don't care if he's acquitted on this one or not, he's still a first class scumbag.

At least I have the guts to say it.

Ok. But that makes you biased.

 

[03EBZ06]

My entire stance is that I don't know the facts and can't come to a conclusion one way or the other until I know the facts. I'm pretty sure that's the definition of unbiased. Is it not?

Actually, as an observer (most of the time), you come across as if you are defending Pacman because your constant confrontation with those who believes he is guilty and doesn't get into any debate with those who believe he is innocent. At least that is how I view your stance.

 

[Stash]

Ok. But that makes you biased.

I never claimed to be unbiased.

But then again, I'm not the one going to bat for Pacman at every turn am I?

I see this guy for the piece of trash that he truly is.

And you see, this is the 'Court of Public Opinion'.

I'm not bound to give the jerk any 'benefit of the doubt' - and I don't.

That ship left town about 6 'incidents' ago.

The guy is no good, and anyone trying to make excuses for what he does, or trying to look the other way, or to find some loophole should be ashamed.

 

[theogt]

Actually, as an observer (most of the time), you come across as if you are defending Pacman because your constant verbal confrontation with those who believes he is guilty and doesn't get into any debate with those who believe he is innocent. At least that is how I view your stance.

I'm not really concerned about those that form ridiculous misinformed perceptions.

 

[03EBZ06]

I'm not really concerned about those that form ridiculous misinformed perceptions.

But of course that is why you had to respond to my comment, after all, it was a worthless comment.

 

[theogt]

I never claimed to be unbiased.

Didn't say you did.

But then again, I'm not the one going to bat for Pacman at every turn am I?

No, you're not. Neither am I.

I see this guy for the piece of trash that he truly is.

And you see, this is the 'Court of Public Opinion'.

I'm not bound to give the jerk any 'benefit of the doubt' - and I don't.

That ship left town about 6 'incidents' ago.

The guy is no good, and anyone trying to make excuses for what he does, or trying to look the other way, or to find some loophole should be ashamed.

Ok.

But you contested whether I was biased or not. Are you now conceding that I am not biased? Or simply ignoring your own argument?

 

[03EBZ06]

Those who claim to be unbiased are most biased people I know of.

 

[Stash]

I'm not really concerned about those that form ridiculous misinformed perceptions.

Yeah.

It sure looks that way.

That's why you've spent the past 3 hours defending your boy.

You want to stand with him?

At least have the guts to do it all the way.