silverbear;1494075 said:
If you get in legal trouble at a strip club, it's probably a good idea to stay away from them... especially if you're hoping to get some lenience for the time you got in trouble at a strip club...
Playing in the NFL is a PRIVILEGE, not a right... and with that privilege comes certain responsibilities, one of the biggies being staying out of trouble with the law...
If Pac-Man thinks that going to strip clubs is more important to him than making a jillion dollars playing in the NFL, then he's welcome to take up residence in one of them... but don't come whinig to me when the league decides he no longer deserves the privilege of playing in the NFL...
I am not slamming the author of this post, just making an observation. Under the law "rights" are things that the law cannot be taken away, while "privileges" are things that can be taken away with less scritiny.
I have seen posts which say that he did not get suspended for going to a strip club. While I am sure that on paper that is the case, I feel certain that the Commish knowing he went factored into his decision. That is akin to throwing a skunk into a jury box and ordering them not to smell it. It likely had some effect, and the only person who knows how much is the Commish.
Let's call a spade a spade here. Pac Man's choice to go to a strip club likely had a MAJOR impact on his suspension. It was, in effect, Pac Man thumbing his nose at the Commish. It was him saying I'll do what I want and you can't stop me. The Commish is essentially saying, oh yeah, well, watch me do something about it and suspended him for a year, which is more severe than he would have gotten under the old Commish, for sure.
All of this talk about "privileges" is a bit of a red herring. In most states, driving a motor vehicle is considered a privilege, but if the state that issued a person's license just pulled it arbitrarily, that person would likely be squealing like a pig. The person that is losing his or her license probably depends on it, at least indirectly to make a living, by getting to and from work.
Even when a privilege is involved, they cannot generally be arbitrarily taken away. I am not saying the Commish arbitrarily took something away from Pac Man, or that he didn't deserve it. On the other hand, it is also clear that he is making an example out of Pac Man.
The more the Commish squeezes Pac Man's family jewels the greater the chance a court will intervene. If the Commish squeezes to hard, and loses, his powers are going to be curtailed by a court at a later date, which is going to be counterproductive to what is intending on accomplishing, which is to clean up the NFL.
The thing I don't quite understand is this. People give lip service to wanting the NFL to clean up its act, but is that really what we want. If Peyton Manning was the equivalent of Pac Man, would you want him to be QB of the Cowboys, if Tony Romo was no longer on the roster?