Panthers Claim Moore

[dooomsday]

Maybe the coaching staff wasn't high on Moore like many people here were.

I would have liked to try to develop him into a backup QB; but I guess the coaching staff didn't see enough in him to do that.

True. Or maybe they gambled and lost. I am curious to know. I see both sides right now.

 

[Vintage]

The fumbles in the Minny game probably did him in?

No clue. Could be that the coaching staff didn't see much of anything in Moore. Maybe they took a gamble and lost. Or maybe they preferred Bartel all along.

Maybe Bartel's arm was something the coaching staff liked and think its worth trying to develop moreso than Moore.

 

[SultanOfSix]

That might come back to haunt us.

Wow. You incessantly rag on Romo, and you think letting an undrafted free agent (like Romo ironically was) get away may haunt us? You're agenda is really transparent.

 

[theogt]

ouch.

Would have been nice to have him over ball.

Not going to affect the team this year anyway, hopefully it wont affect us down the road.

Yeah, gotta say that was a pretty stupid move on our part.

 

[speedkilz88]

Panthers lost their 3rd string qb against New England. They may just use this as an opportunity to audition Moore, since they were planning on carrying only two qbs.

On keeping just two quarterbacks for the second consecutive year: Basically, with Brett (Basanez) getting hurt and being out for the year, we felt that with Jake (Delhomme) and David (Carr) our best decision was to go with two and keep an extra player at another position. It's rolling the dice some. We know that. I think everybody would feel more comfortable keeping three quarterbacks. But you saw last year and I think we'll see this year a number of teams that keep two. Obviously, we'd feel more comfortable with three, but when Brett Basanez got hurt we made the decision to go with two.

 

[DallasEast]

And no head banging icon things yet?

good young QB's don't grow on trees which is why i questioned all those that felt he would not get picked up by another team. sure glad we kept berger on the roster.

BINGO!

 

[blindzebra]

Moore wasn't going to be the guy or even the back up to the guy...Didn't Drew Henson go 9 for 10 his first preseason game too?

Bartel looked just as good as Moore against Minnesota, had McQ not completely whiffed and Stanback hadn't ran the wrong route, I doubt as many of you would be moaning about this.

I'm betting we draft a QB next year in rounds 3-5, somebody with enough upside that we wouldn't be afraid to have him as a back up or at least we'd never think about putting him on the PS.

 

[JPM]

We will RUE it.

I sea what you did there !

 

[speedkilz88]

Moore wasn't going to be the guy or even the back up to the guy...Didn't Drew Henson go 9 for 10 his first preseason game too?

Bartel looked just as good as Moore against Minnesota, had McQ not completely whiffed and Stanback hadn't ran the wrong route, I doubt as many of you would be moaning about this.

I'm betting we draft a QB next year in rounds 3-5, somebody with enough upside that we wouldn't be afraid to have him as a back up or at least we'd never think about putting him on the PS.

They'll probably find another Moore after the draft.

 

[BlueStar II]

Not that I see either Moore or Bartel doing much for us at QB, but between the two, I thought Moore had the better chance to stick around, even if only on the PS.

 

[Cbz40]

But....contrary to many of our self proclaimed experts....Moore didn't make it through waivers.

We did end of w/Bartel on the PC..the kid did show a cannon for a arm.

 

[FLcowboy]

No clue. Could be that the coaching staff didn't see much of anything in Moore. Maybe they took a gamble and lost. Or maybe they preferred Bartel all along.

Maybe Bartel's arm was something the coaching staff liked and think its worth trying to develop more so than Moore.

I think this may be the case. They liked Bartel better, but showcased Moore so that no one would know what they had in Bartel. I remember when they signed him that he got some good reviews early in camp, then all info seemed to dry up.

Moore did look good though............

 

[5Stars]

I think this may be the case. They liked Bartel better, but showcased Moore so that no one would know what they had in Bartel. I remember when they signed him that he got some good reviews early in camp, then all info seemed to dry up.

Moore did look good though............

You might have a very valid point!!

 

[CowboyJeff]

You have to wonder who made this decision, and why? I wonder if we wanted him back at all? You would think... But you never know.

Parcells is no longer with the team, so all future personnel decisions will work just fine.

 

[5Stars]

Parcells is no longer with the team, so all future personnel decisions will work just fine.

Did you just slap Jerry Jones upside his fat head?

 

[CowboyJeff]

Did you just slap Jerry Jones upside his fat head?

anything is possible

 

[maxsports]

Where have you been the last ten years?

I hope u are being sarcastic. Quincy (WASTE OF TIME) Carter is the only young QB we have drafted since Aikman. The rest came off baseball fields or somewhere else.

 

[5Stars]

I hope u are being sarcastic. Quincy (WASTE OF TIME) Carter is the only young QB we have drafted since Aikman. The rest came off baseball fields or somewhere else.

But, QC was a wasted baseball player too?

As a matter of fact, QC was wasted all the time!

 

[Taz]

bartel has a better arm hopefully we can practice quad him

 

[Cbz40]

bartel has a better arm hopefully we can practice quad him

Cowboys | Bartel signs to practice squad
Sun, 2 Sep 2007 12:51:22 -0700 KFFL has learned the Dallas Cowboys have signed unrestricted free-agent QB Richard Bartel (Cowboys) to their practice squad.