Daillest88
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 13,552
- Reaction score
- 15,398
One thing that makes me crack up is any time a free agent is discussed, inevitably, if the guy isn't 25 or 26 years old you have people saying "can't sign the player, he's not young".
It's a funny comment considering that the whole team is based around a QB who is not "young". This isn't some team stocked with young players that is building up to something in 3-4 years, we are team that pretty much has to win NOW because realistically we have a window of 1-3 years of Romo being able to play at a SB level. So signing an "old" player here or there isn't going to destroy any master plan we have.
That doesn't mean you go Broncos and sign a bunch of aging veterans but immediately discounting signing a particular guy because he's too old is pretty silly IMO when one realizes the entire success in the next 2-4 years is riding on the shoulders of a 36 year old QB with a busted collarbone and a balky back.
We probably can't afford Norman anyway and in no way am I saying that we have to have him, but dismissing him because he's not young (he's freaking 28) is comical to me.
true.. and that's not even old for a corner. as a matter of fact that's pretty much prime years for any type of player..