TrailBlazer
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 5,841
- Reaction score
- 3,525
I never said having a win equals good. My point is, they have beat teams. And we very well could've been one of those teams. We aren't the Seahawks. We could've lost to the Raiders yesterday.
So who is a above average team. I'll remember to let you know then. Bears aren't above average because they stink and if we beat them they'll probably either have more losses than wins or be a .500 team. How about the Packers? May or may not have Rodgers but he'll be hurt so that win won't count. Then we have Eagirls and Deadskins....I guess i'll have to contact you in the post season when we finally beat someone....?
I've seen enough form Amendola to know that he's nowhere near a healthy Miles league and if he was on this team he'd probably be our 5th option behind Demarco, Witten, Miles and Dez.
That is laughable. If amendola were on our team, nor miles or Beasley would see the field much. Amendola would be our slot receiver and a very good third receiving option. Amendola is much quicker and in his prime. Miles has only a couple seasons left. Going forward, miles will not bring much to the table. Amendola will be good for years to come. It really is not close. Saying anything else is just being a blind homer. If you can watch miles play and then watch amendola and somehow you conclude miles is better at this point in time, then you lose all credibility.
At this point in time, no GM would pick miles over amendola. That is a no brainer. And you have nothing to say about miles being the worst value contract on this team.