FanofJerry
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 2,451
- Reaction score
- 1,352
I agree with your post. The league owners have to come together on how to deal with high level QBs that hit the market or are about to. You cant have one trailblazer and all the other guys fighting to pay Brock Purdy whatever he wants to come to their team. Every owner will have to be on board with how to deal with QB market prices and all stick to the plan.QB contracts have forced teams to make decisions they haven't had to make in the past. It is true, if Dak leaves he might get $60 million somewhere else. Look at what Cleveland handed Watson. But every team is different and has different CAP situations. The Cowboys have CeeDee and Micah, two top players at other positions who will get paid near the top for their positions. How do you pay Dak $60 million, CeeDee close to $30 million and Micah probably somewhere in the same ball park? That is a lot of money to dedicate to 3 players.
The bigger problem is how these contracts are structured. They make the first year or two CAP friendly and the last years not friendly at all. Look at Dak this year, and he has $40 million in voidable years too. If Dak signs for $60 million chances are the last year or two of his deal will mean a CAP hit close to $90 million.
Also, Dak is making $40 million per year on his current contract. $60 million is a 50% increase over that. Has he played that well that he deserves a 50% salary increase? Give him $45 million and add incentives if he win playoff games and a Super Bowl.
Is there not a Bird Rights type of situation that can be employed for QB's only? I assume that would conflict with bargaining agreement somehow.
Anyway...my main point is...which QB is taking heavy incentives for winning a Super Bowl? Dak didnt allow 250 rushing yard to GB in one half. You cant have a team stat for individual player incentive. It makes no sense. Which is why GM's pay non-SB-winning QBs a lot of money...because there is more than just QB play involved in winning games.
I dont get why this board insists on team stats to define a player. It has to be by design to frustrate because it makes no sense otherwise.
A more realistic incentive would be getting very wordy and come down to lawyers being involved...but something like if in a Super Bowl and a QB is down 5 or more points going into the 3rd or 4th quarter and completes 75% of at least 20 passes that are in the air for longer than 5 yards at a time and the team wins....the QB gets a very large production bonus. But...then the QB can argue that the passing scheme was not in his favor or the QB can only target WR's that help him get his bonus. Or the running game or defense is the real game winner for the team but the QB gets a large bonus. It gets complicated.
Everyone wants free markets but they dont agree with it in regards to NFL QB salary....yet all these same people complaining would be lining up to pay Purdy whatever he wanted if he was gettable. Its a complete contradiction.