Sydla
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 61,728
- Reaction score
- 95,246
A direct quote from the article.
I should never be surprised by the opinions on this board. Although there are some opinions that outright shock me. Hell, some of them are mine.
But the idea some brought to the table prior to the draft the Dallas running game wasn't the lynchpin to the success of 2014 was truly amazing. To the point for a brief moment I questioned what I knew. Yet there is no chance of getting away from the truth the running game benefited the passing game and the defense.
And after seeing all the players and coaches and GMs, and even what the team accepts as fact, I wonder where those folks are who put pencil to paper and did some statistical analysis to come away with an opinion contrary to not only what people in football were saying, but the most basic truth to what this game is about.
Moving the chains, staying ahead of third down, controlling the ball and clock, and protecting the defense, as most teams do.
Here it is, the way the team, along with most people associated with this game think about Elliott versus Ramsey. It's basic logic.
Except very few actually said this. This is a total strawman on your part.
What they said was that with this OL Dallas could still have a great running game without having to use the 4th pick in a draft on a TB. Further, that while the running game was very important to the success of that season, the glue that holds it all together is Romo and once you subtract Romo from the mix, it doesn't matter who you have running the ball.