These kind of posts ....
Of course you take Dak over Ben R who is playing poorly, costs a fortune and is nearing retirement.
This Receiving corp ranks last in the NFL according to most standards.
These two sentences caught my eye...
Ben is averaging 340 yards per game and has nearly double the TD passes Dak has. If Dak's numbers make him underapprecaited in your book, then how do Ben's numbers indicate poor performance?
I will agree with you that Ben's contract is significantly costlier but I don't believe PFF factors your salary into their ratings, do they?
Ben is doing it without the benefit of Bell, who is one of maybe 2-3 guys in the league that might have been a better back than Zeke in recent years. Ben is also playing with AB, admittedly a definite advantage, but that's a two way street (is it the Receiver, the QB, or both), which leads me right into your second sentence.
Is the WR ranking a chicken or egg thing?
I heard Romo gush and gush about how Beasley is virtually "unguardable" during Sunday's broadcast.
Yet until last week, he was utter trash and a poster boy for the issues Dak has to overcome. Cole said he was getting open, and the legions of Dak enthusiasts howled with laughter at the thought that anyone in our receiving corps was getting open.
What I can tell you is, since #4 took over, we've seen more than couple of guys turn from Franchise record holders (Dez and Witten) into "problems" that Dak was being saddled with.
Could be a coincidence....