beware_d-ware
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 7,483
- Reaction score
- 9,115
every 1 tech we deploy will rate horribly because pff is schematically ignorant.
that is, they could careless how well he does what the coaches ask of him and only care if they judge him to be successful.
rod would tell you woods is a stud 1T.
As another user here pointed out, PFF struggles for players like zone DBs or 1 techs that don't really have a clearly defined role on a play and consistently grades them low. 1 techs for example, their job is to eat a double team. On most between the tackles running plays, the blocking scheme calls for the O linemen to double the DT on the point of attack, and then if you get movement, one of the OLs peels up to take care of the LB. The 1 tech's job is to hold the double team and keep that LB clean to make the tackle. So his job isn't clearly defined, other than "hold your ground and cause problems for blockers." He's going to get eaten up most of the time by design, but he's doing the job his coaches ask him to do.
Zone defenders, same thing. There's so many pass-ons and pass-offs in zone coverage that it's hard to tell who has responsibility for covering who on every single play. And schematically, zone defenses tend towards a "bend but don't break" philosophy that's sometimes willing to give up plays underneath. If you're a CB in deep zone and you give up an 8 yard catch on 3rd and 10, you're doing exactly what your coaches want you to do.