That is possible, but it would be incredibly stupid for a big business like marriot to do such a thing, knowing they could get sued.
I'm just telling you how the human mind works generally speaking. Fact of the matter is even without a few drinks he wouldnt remember anyways.
If what is true? He clearly did not grope her. He clearly did not grab her and force her into a corner, he clearly did not make threatening statements to her. So if he tried to pick up on her by saying hey, you look damn fine, how would you like to come up to my room for a little fun.... that should get you fired? Ive been asking this type of question for days and nobody answers it.
Irvin having to pay it???? Uhm, is Irvin getting sued? Did I miss something?
The nfl cant what? Ban Irvin? Uhm, you do know they have a contractual business relationship, yes? Ig the NFL pays out his contract, yes, they can do what they want.... BUT, if Irvin shows they got rid of him based upon these accusations and they end up being shown to be false in court, the NFL could get sued just like Marriott.
to me is not what matters. How ths will be portrayed a=in court, and using exact words in court matters... not your interpretations.
It was around 11pm at a local hotel. Do you think HR is around at 11pm? Do you think someone from HR was contacted at 11pm over some words supposedly said by a hotel guest? HR would have had zero to do with this encounter..... UNLESS, the shift manager called their boss because they knew they were dealing with a celebrity and there would clearly be media as a result of this. I know I would have called my boss, then maybe that person also was like... uhm, im not touching this, im calling my boss. Now that COULD have happened.
not only that, they argued that Irvins legal team should be precluded from turning the video over to the public once they get it... and the judge disagreed.
Well I agree with one thing he said... reading is fundamental. How many people in here have said Irvin was "Drunk," and they also claimed Irvin said that he was drunk, despite the indisputable FACT that he said no such thing....lol
I went to a KISS concert with my wife.... probably 10 years ago. I went all out and did the entire Demon costume, makeup, hair, shoes, I was stopped all night long by people talking to me wanting to take pictures. I couldnt even go to the bathroom without getting stopped tat night. It was nuts.
ok so if your version of it happened , I doubt the complaint would have been filed if just words, but it depends on if they have the audio of what he said.
More like they tried to do that with the judge. Did they think a federal judge would be OK with having his orders ignored?
I do not understand why this fact is so hard to get. As I stated in my post after yours... Irvin is not like "Most people." Can you imagine how many small talk conversations that Irvin had from 8am to 11pm in that lobby with people he had never met on that 1 day alone?
well what else could have happened besides what I described? It had to ONLY BE WORDS, because NOBODY, even Marriotts own lawyers have said Mike groped or fondled her. So this much I think we can all agree on, there was zero sexual touching that took place. Would you agree with that? If so, then all that leaves are words, and this conversation was 90 seconds long..... what else could he have said that is any worse than what I described? And all that is, is a man trying to pick up a woman. Hardly a crime.
He may not remember word-for-word what was said, but unless he was drunk (which he does claim to not remember because he was drinking .. his words), most people, even Michael Irvin, would remember some sort of context from the discussion.
I said 2 nights ago that Marriott was about to get B slapped by the judge. I actually had others trying to explain away what Marriott did....lol. Exactly what I said was gonna happen, happened. People were arguing the judge agreed with Marriott about keeping the face of the accuser out of the public.... dont know where they possibly got that from, but the judge apparently didnt buy that either. Read what the judge said... he smacked Marriott right across the face with his response yesterday.
I wonder if any of this is on that video?
I normally shake my head anytime race is used with stuff like this. But in this case he is saying it was just like back then. n accusation is made and BAM... the result happened immediately regardless of what Mike has said. Nobody has listened to him and his entire life has been turned upside down, regardless of what he has said. In that context, the comparison is right.Whatever.
Thanks for your part in 3 SB wins Mike, but your behavior off the field has been questionable for years and comparing this legal proceeding to a "lynching" was one of the dumbest, tone deaf, things I've ever heard. I don't care how this case ends, I just want it to end.
And if he loses in court because the jury doesn't believe him, he runs the risk of the morals clause in his contract and could receive nothing. The NFLN is the interested party on the sideline in this one.
