Looks like Willie's posse did most of the damage...Willie McGinest attack at restaurant
https://www.tmz.com/watch/2022-12-19-121922-willie-mcginest-1534622-901/
He started by saying he’d had a few drinks and couldn’t remember.Curious, how does one prove that they didn't say something?
Then why say "Irvin has failed to provide proof that he did not do what the woman says he did."Since there are no witnesses to what was said, nothing gets proven.
It is simply which person does one believe.
Well, one of the people who came out as a witness has been almost completely discredited as I pointed out on here before (SEE LINK).I understand that, but he also had 2-3 people sitting at a table nearby come to his defense about the interaction.
Well, if you look at how the NFL is handling their end, looks like they're not in his believer's corner.Then why say "Irvin has failed to provide proof that he did not do what the woman says he did."
Bit impossible.
Looks like Willie's posse did most of the damage...
ive not seen anything that has confirmed it.... but I suspect this is why the NFLN has not been included in any lawsuit. I would be my life that Irvin has been and will continue to be paid by the NFLN.... likely until his current contract expires.well i was unaware he was getting paid. but not gonna lie i haven't been following this story closely.
you jump to such conclusions. Fox just paid a 780 million dollar settlement that said they are a bunch of liars and followed that up with a statement saying they wil continue to uphold the highest of journalistic standards.Well, if you look at how the NFL is handling their end, looks like they're not in his believer's corner.
I would bet that's the general consensus of anyone following this.
Do you think most people that are following this, and I doubt that many are, think Irvin didn't say something to get himself into this?you jump to such conclusions. Fox just paid a 780 million dollar settlement that said they are a bunch of liars and followed that up with a statement saying they wil continue to uphold the highest of journalistic standards.
The NFL is doing what all companies do. They cover their arse and they do not care about any employee. They will always do what is in their best interests, and right now, it is in their interests to put Irvin in the corner.
Journey had a drummer, his name is Dean Castronova ( think I spelled it right) and he had some domestic violence accusations against him back in 2015. As soon as tose accusations became public, Journey let him go. They let him plead guilty, he did whatever was required of him and last year he was very quietly brought back into the band.
Journey did what they did to protect their image at the expense of the person. Then as public interests wanes, they did what they really wanted to do in the first place... keep the guy in the band.
I don't think it's over for him at the networks... but while legal matters persist on as it apparently is right now. It's a dark cloud that is gonna continue to hang over him andI think it is over for him ..his next gig would be on Radio or his own you tube channel.
They took vick, they will take anybody.I don't think it's over for him at the networks... but while legal matters persist on as it apparently is right now. It's a dark cloud that is gonna continue to hang over him and
hinder him from the spot light he enjoyed so much.
If the legal matters linger, then kiss the preseason, regular season good bye.
I don't place Irvin in the same sense as Willie McGinest who is involved in an domestic assault crime.
Irvin case isn't in that state and he also has visual evidence aiding him in the accusations.
And maybe no pre-game co-host is as popular and enthusiastic charismatic as Irvin.
If this turns out right for him, he will get another go at the networks again, even if it means the likes of Fox Sports, etc.
The bottom line, Mike ticked off an NFL partner. Amazing a little routine flirting has turned into this.There isn’t any because he would be fired and not suspended. This is crazy.
Valid points for sure. I can't disagree with anything you've said.Unfortunate for him, Michael Irvin has a reputation. Whether he did it or didn't, he's been around these type situations too many times.
He survived because ...
1. He's a die-hard Cowboys fan and former player whose fan base and audience is a big draw for sports shows
2. He has charisma
3. He mixes well with other on-air personalities and
4. The women empowerment culture still lags a bit because television and sports still cater to men
However ...
1. There are many more former Cowboy players ready to take their places in the booth
2. Charisma can't save you when repeated claims of sexual misconduct hound you
3. and 4. The networks are featuring more women as commentators, and it would be awkward to keep Michael around
5. Michael is getting older.
I think he's done as far as NFL Network. He may be done on ESPN too.
sure if like you they hate IrvinWell, if you look at how the NFL is handling their end, looks like they're not in his believer's corner.
I would bet that's the general consensus of anyone following this.
add referee to the listValid points for sure. I can't disagree with anything you've said.
However, put me down for the unpopular opinion.... I don't want to listen to women talk about football, period. I prefer commentators who played the game, & or coached the game, preferably at a high level.
It's hard to respect someone's opinion talking about something they haven't done themselves.
It's the type of job he had that's the problem. Any little thing can get you tossed. You think if he was 25 and playing for the Cowboys he'd lose his job over this? A normal person can be fired for doing something on the job. Off the job no one cares. But Irvin's job requires him to be squeaky clean 24/7.The NFL has decided to keep Michael Irvin suspended based on "merit". Ok, so where is the concrete evidence against Irvin to keep him suspended?