PFT: NFL says Gregory “not in compliance,” not eligible to return to practice yet

csirl

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,924
Reaction score
4,234
Does anyone know what this compliance thing is? Was the wrong paperwork filed? What could he possibly not be in compliance over?

Yea we know about the appeal but I wouldn't think that has anything to do with being in compliance

one common type of non compliance is refusing to give whereabouts information so testers can't find you.
 

Jeffkills

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,125
Reaction score
2,749
I think it's clear that Jerry's instructed the NFL to forgo slapping him with that third violation for these many months, which could have potentially ended his season, but instead, we get a shot with him the final two games and the playoffs...

The NFL knows who their master is, and he likes him some '**********!'
 

1972COWBOY

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,041
Reaction score
1,901
That was uncalled for, now wasn't it, old fellow?
Please apologise or delete.
You may have read it the wrong way. Pot is decrimalized up here and now legal just 30 mins from me. So we dont take pot too seriously anymore. Nothing against American Indians either just they did Pow Wows and smokem peace pipes that where rumored to have had some weed in those pipes. All in fun, nothing discriminatory or meaning to make other feel bad. I would be up for a deletion if I could just based on one member wanting it so in order to keep harmony in the forum.

The main point is: the NFL is taking Pot (something that legal in states now) too seriously and what next? testing for alcohol usage. Maybe I should have suggested Mile High Stadium instead of Dallas Stadium as Pot is legal in Denver..
 
Last edited:

JW82

JJ21
Messages
6,359
Reaction score
10,473
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
No chance at all that Mara AKA the real commish lets 94 play when the gspots are in the playoff hunt.
 

Plankton

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,256
Reaction score
18,644
I don't think that's true. This summer it was announced that Le'Veon Bell was suspended for four games and he was able to appeal it in August and it was reduced.

The league didn't announce it. It was a leak from a source.

The league cannot announce a suspension on the record until the appeals process is completed. That's the procedure per the CBA. There's nothing preventing the player or his representation from saying anything, but the league cannot.
 

Beast_from_East

Well-Known Member
Messages
30,140
Reaction score
27,231
No chance at all that Mara AKA the real commish lets 94 play when the gspots are in the playoff hunt.
I am fully expecting a hand picked officiating crew by Mara this Sunday, so any big runs that Zeke get expect a phantom hold to call it back.

Just saying.
 

AzorAhai

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,511
Reaction score
8,901
If the typical rules allow for a player to practice 2 weeks before coming off suspension, not in compliance most likely means that due to the pending suspension, he is not eligible for that 2 weeks. If he had no further suspension pending(appeals or not), that's probably what being in compliance is.
 

Hawkeye19

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,645
Reaction score
22,720
So was this newest report deemed false yet? Didn't want to sift through comments...

The rumor is that he missed a test-- which the league treats the same as a failed test. He is suspended for 2 more games under the current 10 game ban-- and can then return.

If he's suspended for a 3rd time-- it will be for a year, and he can appeal the suspension and play games until a decision is made on his appeal.
 

CATCH17

1st Round Pick
Messages
67,663
Reaction score
86,202
You may have read it the wrong way. Pot is decrimalized up here and now legal just 30 mins from me. So we dont take pot too seriously anymore. Nothing against American Indians either just they did Pow Wows and smokem peace pipes that where rumored to have had some weed in those pipes. All in fun, nothing discriminatory or meaning to make other feel bad. I would be up for a deletion if I could just based on one member wanting it so in order to keep harmony in the forum.

The main point is: the NFL is taking Pot (something that legal in states now) too seriously and what next? testing for alcohol usage. Maybe I should have suggested Mile High Stadium instead of Dallas Stadium as Pot is legal in Denver..


I think the NFL & Players know it's a problem but they can't change the rules until the next collective bargaining agreement so they have to obey the current rules.
 

CATCH17

1st Round Pick
Messages
67,663
Reaction score
86,202
The reporting is not the problem.

It is the complete lack of transparency from the league. Either suspend him or not.


And taking AGES to make decisions.

And holding themselves higher than the Legal System.

Why do the owners want the NFL investigating anyways? Stay out of legal things. You don't need to investigate a player that our legal system finds not guilty of anything.
 

Old'Boyfan

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,253
Reaction score
1,450
Not saying that the NFL is up-front and transparent on this issue but I'm not going to believe anything ANY writer says about this until the NFL makes an official statement.
 

CATCH17

1st Round Pick
Messages
67,663
Reaction score
86,202
The rumor is that he missed a test-- which the league treats the same as a failed test. He is suspended for 2 more games under the current 10 game ban-- and can then return.

If he's suspended for a 3rd time-- it will be for a year, and he can appeal the suspension and play games until a decision is made on his appeal.

So we should be able to get him back for the Lions game?
 

Kevinicus

Well-Known Member
Messages
19,884
Reaction score
12,670
And taking AGES to make decisions.

And holding themselves higher than the Legal System.

Why do the owners want the NFL investigating anyways? Stay out of legal things. You don't need to investigate a player that our legal system finds not guilty of anything.

Almost all businesses hold themselves to a higher standard than the legal system (which is not a high standard). Just because something is legal doesn't mean a company has to allow it.
 
Top