BlueStar II
New Member
- Messages
- 1,815
- Reaction score
- 1
It's too early to get worried about his hands/focus, let's hope that we'll be able to write this off as just "rookie adjustment".
**This is from a direct post he made to start a thread over at The Ranch.
You guys are not going to like what I'm getting ready to type
bbgun;2124812 said:Have you seen the "leeblair" thread over there? 24 pages devoted to one poster.
ScipioCowboy;2124829 said:"Slow" and "aggie" are synonymous.
dooomsday;2125019 said:Well Sweed is impressing the heck out of Pitts and they say the opposite of Bennett. Hard worker, eager to learn, picking it all up etc. If I had to take a project in round 2 it would be at a position of need and not a position with an All Pro already entrenched. What did Bennett do to deserve his draft slot? Have a good sr.year in high school? All sizzle no steak.
But, no, not a reach at 60 for a team without a TE. I saw him projected at #45. We just dont need him. Funny thing is his heart,attitude, his speed and his discipline were all flags and could be the reason he fell and was 4th TE taken (as opposed to first). They are also the things we read about now.
JJ also said he targeted Hardy. If he wanted to trade up there were 3-4 traded that did take place at the top of the 2nd round. We didnt get it done.
On Sweed in Pitts:
http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/sports/s_572844.html
"He is very humble. He communicates. He is not afraid to ask questions," Steelers coach Mike Tomlin said. "His passion for the game shows through the minute he walks into the building which allows you to indicate that he has a chance to be what we think he is capable of being."
Translation: the Steelers may have found a keeper.
Sweed has a unique blend of size and speed and is a tremendous leaper. Long and lean as a goal post, he is also deceptively strong -- he could bench press more than 300 pounds when he was in high school -- and he almost certainly wouldn't have been available when the Steelers picked in the second round of the draft had a wrist injury not derailed his senior season at Texas.
SilverStarCowboy;2125095 said:He was Drafted to block anyway. That's what Martelleus did at A&M, he blocked well.
Curtis and Witten are better than Fasano anyway.
On the field at the same time, Curtis and Bennett should be great options for the running play.
Beyond that, HELLO! He's a Rookie in his first Minni-Camp.
http://www.dallascowboys.com/news.cfm?id=B0C98277-FA78-0F76-56B522FB30B29BFBHard Not To Notice
One guy hard to miss the first two days of this three-day mini-camp has been second-round draft choice Martellus Bennett. And for more reasons than just being 6-6.
The tight end from Texas A&M so far has done a nice job of catching the ball, but maybe even more noticeable has been his ability to run routes and get open in these individual drills.
"He has a feel for space and where other people are," Phillips said. "And he has good body control . . . he's got a little separation."
Phillips means Bennett can break away from defensive backs or linebackers running pass routes.
Jerry Jones keeps seeing the possibilities of utilizing Bennett in the red zone, especially inside the 10 when the field gets congested, except up there where only a 6-6 player with leaping ability can go.
SilverStarCowboy;2125095 said:He was Drafted to block anyway. That's what Martelleus did at A&M, he blocked well.
Curtis and Witten are better than Fasano anyway.
On the field at the same time, Curtis and Bennett should be great options for the running play.
Beyond that, HELLO! He's a Rookie in his first Minni-Camp.
Biggems;2125156 said:BTW, I kinda would have liked Cottam...cause of his size, red zone possibilities, and he went to Tennessee also. I think he and Witten would have some nice chemistry.
AdamJT13;2124834 said:Lots of rookies look bad in their first minicamp. Lots of rookies look great in their first minicamp.
Lots of rookies look bad in training camp. Lots of rookies look great in training camp.
Lots of rookies look bad in the preseason. Lots of rookies look great in the preseason.
Lots of rookies look bad in the first few games of the regular season. Lots of rookies look great in the first few games of the regular season.
Of course, it's not always the same rookies looking "bad" or "great" at each stage, some rookies are both at different stages, and none of that necessarily indicates how good that player will be by the end of their rookie season or for the rest of their career.
Remember last August, when Pro Football Talk stated, "There's already talk in league circles that defensive tackle Amobi Okoye, the No. 10 overall pick in the draft, could be a bust. ... As one source said, he's the "creation of a good P.R. campaign," and "there's no way he's a first-round pick."
Sixteen regular-season games later, Okoye was named to most -- if not all -- of the All-Rookie teams.
Fletch;2125144 said:And this coming from a guy who dorns the transformer logo.
That's not true.Kangaroo;2124796 said:This is called over reaction typical if a rookie does not look like a pro bowler in 5 seconds they are a bust
:bang2::bang2::bang2:
Would this be the same type of people that use to raved about chutch in practice on 11 on 11 drills and put Romo down because Chad threw that rocket ball.
How did that turn out
Spectre;2125191 said:That's not true.
If you are drafted high to play a professional sport, you should a high level of ability immediately. Period. No excuses. Excuses are for rec-leagues and school teams.
I'm not saying some players don't improve but I think Bennett wil be a bust.
dbair1967;2125146 said:60+ posts in response to PhilTurd's view on a player?
This guy is a waste of time, just like his awful forum