DallasCowpoke
Fierce Allegiance
- Messages
- 5,539
- Reaction score
- 302
CanadianCowboysFan;2246429 said:any Canadian could take you personally in a second
"Yea, what my countryman said!!"
ohhh, wait!
CanadianCowboysFan;2246429 said:any Canadian could take you personally in a second
stealth;2246406 said:dude, you are one of the bigger trolls here, I don't even get the audacity that would warrant you complaining.
And wait, we can't bash canada anymore?
How in the hell would that even be against the rules?
CanadianCowboysFan;2246481 said:for the same reason we aren't allowed to bash the US, hell to some questioning US policy is bashing the US :
CanadianCowboysFan;2246481 said:for the same reason we aren't allowed to bash the US, hell to some questioning US policy is bashing the US :
bbgun;2246499 said:You wouldn't get an infraction, but you sure would get an argument.
Hostile;2246383 said:Since we punish people privately how the hell do you know this?
Don't assume.
Vintage;2246257 said:So... SOB and BS are not warnable, since its "circumventing" the filter...
Odd.
I call that abbreviating.
But to each their own.
CanadianCowboysFan;2246429 said:any Canadian could take you personally in a second
with what? some hockey sticks.Bob Sacamano;2248218 said:Canadians get no respect, I say it's time for Canada to strike!
Rampage;2248225 said:with what? some hockey sticks.
BadWolf;2245826 said:I think Commander loving should be filtered
stealth;2248231 said:maple syrup burns like acid when you get it in your eyes, don't ask me how I know that
Bob Sacamano;2248239 said:you tried to touch a buxom Canadian's goodies, be honest
Cowboy Bill Watts;2248363 said:the best way to avoid the infraction is to not use filtered language at all.
for the literate, it is unnecessary...