RonnieT24
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 14,405
- Reaction score
- 22,800
I don't think "being the guy" has to do with volume, it has to do with production. I don't care if he gets 10 or 15 carries, if he's breaking off long runs and scoring, he is "the guy".
Not if he's only doing it every third game and has too many 8 carries for 9 yards type games he's not. The fact of the matter is good defensive fronts have stonewalled Pollard on more than one occasion .. while Zeke might drop from 5.5 ypc against chumps to 4.5 ypc against decent fronts to 3.5 ypc against good fronts, Pollard has gone from 7 ypc against chumps, 5 ypc against decent all the way down to < 2 ypc against good fronts.. His highs are higher but his lows are lower. Which I guess works to a point but which one you prefer is kind of a vanilla/chocolate/strawberry kinda question. You also have to ask yourself which you're more likely to see come playoff time. I know what my guess would be..
To me it still comes back to needing both because having both enables you to play different styles and different styles force defenses to prepare for and defense differently. To me that's advantage Cowboys.. It also bears stating again that playing Pollard more tires him out and will eventually cause him to lose that big play ability. The physical beating of fighting through a good front 7 versus a triple A team front 7 like the Bears is a real thing. Fortunately for us, Green Bay is another patsy defense. If Zeke sits I fully expect Pollard to eat against them. If Zeke plays I expect him to do likewise.