waldoputty
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 23,375
- Reaction score
- 21,163
yep, kind of like what those articles are saying.
seems kind of obvious but apparently not really done...
The Cowboys defense allowed 48 points total in the last 4 games.If Dallas doesn't sign some FA's for the defense dont expect much from this defense.
Oddly enough, that is exactly what we needed to do to make the offense Romo-friendly.Dak friendly means getting him the best offensive line in the NFL so he can hand the ball off and on occasions throw his bread and butter short passes. Any pressure and he runs to the outside, not sure why he scared to step up in the pocket. oh well
Dak friendly..best offensive line in the NFL
There has been reports of the offense changing to be more Dak friendly RPO offenses.
So the signing of 2 wrs may be confirming some of these plans.
they still must fix the ol
1. more 4 or 5 receiver sets (zeke lining up wide sometimes). hopefully these RPO sets with better receivers would be less predictable.
2 less emphasis on TEs - so witten may not stay long and his contract can pay for the 2 wr signings
3. we may keep 6 or 7 wrs while less TE's, but the wr's with the worst hands are in danger (twill, dez)
-- possession - dez, hurns and brown
-- slot - beasley and may be switzer
-- deep threat - twill and thompson
4. players in danger of cut/trade
-- 2018 - witten and perhaps twill (june 1st)
-- 2019 - dez, twill, witten
5. final signing
-- swing ot, possibly fs if cheap
6. projected draft - no wr in 2018
#1 guard or ot such as hernandez or mcglinchey
#2 lb or 1tech
#3 lb or 1tech
#4 rb
#4a ol or 1tech or fs
#5 ol, fs
And here I was, thinking I was the only one who hates throwing three fades into the endzone and then kicking a field goal.I don't think it's that simple.
For one, they force feed low percentage passes to Dez. We aren't throwing low percentage fades in the red zone to TWill or Butler or Beasley. We throw them to Dez. And for the record, I absolutely despise the fade. LOL.
I think the coaching staff does a poor job of using Dez. Now that's not to excuse Dez who had a case of the dropsies last year and part of his route running issues are his own, no one elses.
But I honestly believe that while Dez bears responsibility, the way we use him did not lend itself to him producing. I'd like to see the rumors of more crossing routes, slants come to fruition. I think Dez's numbers would jump if used properly.
Dak had a 52% completion rate to Dez last year.
Dak had a 70% completion rate to everyone else.
Dez has the worst completion rate of any WR in the NFL over the last three years.
Seems like a case of additional by subtraction if you want to be Dak friendly.
LG?This is the thing for me though. We have the best RB in the league. We don’t need to upgrade the starters on the OL. We need to add depth so that when one of the elites goes down we don’t have a guy that worked at UPS last month come in.
Dak needs to get better at reading defenses. His RPO reads were a bit slow last year and he held on to the ball too long. This and subpar line play lead to him being under constant pressure when Smith was banged up.There has been reports of the offense changing to be more Dak friendly RPO offenses.
So the signing of 2 wrs may be confirming some of these plans.
they still must fix the ol
1. more 4 or 5 receiver sets (zeke lining up wide sometimes). hopefully these RPO sets with better receivers would be less predictable.
2 less emphasis on TEs - so witten may not stay long and his contract can pay for the 2 wr signings
3. we may keep 6 or 7 wrs while less TE's, but the wr's with the worst hands are in danger (twill, dez)
-- possession - dez, hurns and brown
-- slot - beasley and may be switzer
-- deep threat - twill and thompson
4. players in danger of cut/trade
-- 2018 - witten and perhaps twill (june 1st)
-- 2019 - dez, twill, witten
5. final signing
-- swing ot, possibly fs if cheap
6. projected draft - no wr in 2018
#1 guard or ot such as hernandez or mcglinchey
#2 lb or 1tech
#3 lb or 1tech
#4 rb
#4a ol or 1tech or fs
#5 ol, fs
Dak needs to get better at reading defenses. His RPO reads were a bit slow last year and he held on to the ball too long. This and subpar line play lead to him being under constant pressure when Smith was banged up.
Dak needs to get better at reading defenses. His RPO reads were a bit slow last year and he held on to the ball too long. This and subpar line play lead to him being under constant pressure when Smith was banged up.
First, lets be realistic. We replaced Butler who was our 4'th option behind Dez, Witten, T Will and Bease. So no change there at all really, a little more speed maybe. Signing Hurns could signal the end of T Will. A post June 1 cut would save $3.5 mill on the cap but also create $3.5 mill spread over 2 years in dead cap.. For all the things T Will isn't, he is durable though. Hurns has had some problems stayin in the field the last two years. It makes sense to use our 37 year old TE in fewer than 97% of the offensive snaps too, whether that is Dak friendly or not. Witt isn't even our best blocking TE now. Hanna is his equal in blocking. We're starting to see the changing of the guard at WR. Agree with your draft projections pretty much but I wouldn't rule out a WR, just not high in the draft
There does seem to be talk of using Dak more like he was used in college with more RPO's. Do I trust Linnehan to create an effective offense like that? NO!!
Dak needs to get better at reading defenses. His RPO reads were a bit slow last year and he held on to the ball too long. This and subpar line play lead to him being under constant pressure when Smith was banged up.
LOL he is saying he wants some better plays .that is kind of what i am reading
you can read it for yourself - https://cowboyswire.usatoday.com/20...iagrams-run-pass-options-jet-sweeps-bootlegs/
a few articles quote dak saying that it is more dak friendly to use some chief / panthers rpo plays.
instead of just roll-outs which other teams adapted to, there are some counters for other team's adjustments.
the article listed 3-4 examples of how to counter defense adjustments
This is the thing for me though. We have the best RB in the league. We don’t need to upgrade the starters on the OL. We need to add depth so that when one of the elites goes down we don’t have a guy that worked at UPS last month come in.
Yeah it's possible they carry 6 WR's. They carried 6 last year. Dez, Bease, T Will, Switzer, Butler and Brown. Thompson plays on ST's. Obviously Switzer and Bease as well. Not sure about Hurns. That gives them some flexibility. As far as seeing 5 on the field at the same time, Linnehan should figure out any of their strengths and use them that way. Some hopes for Lal but honestly Dez, Bease and T will are one trick ponies and we don't use them to their strengths IMO. Bease maybeaccording to the article i posted, those plays were used by chiefs and panthers. they would need to adapt it to their personnel and i think we will go at least 6 in wrs.
OP, what receivers are starting? Dez, Hurns, TWill, and Thompson? Bease replased or Thompson over takes TWill?that is kind of what i am reading
you can read it for yourself - https://cowboyswire.usatoday.com/20...iagrams-run-pass-options-jet-sweeps-bootlegs/
a few articles quote dak saying that it is more dak friendly to use some chief / panthers rpo plays.
instead of just roll-outs which other teams adapted to, there are some counters for other team's adjustments.
the article listed 3-4 examples of how to counter defense adjustments