I see.
He wasn't good enough and needed more help around him. So how do you
measure that except for the fact that they didn't advance? What were the flaws he had that kept them from advancing? How do people overcome their flaws except by removing them? Name one person who thought he was Tom Brady. You're just throwing out vague claims and platitudes that mean nothing.
If Dak was on those teams, would he have been "good enough" to overcome the lack of help on those teams? If this team advances further is it because of Dak, or is it because the team has been built to be "good enough" for Dak? These are rhetorical by the way.
2014 and 2016 were not "essentially" the same teams. And talk about missing the point about me mentioning the 2016 season.