JD_KaPow
jimnabby
- Messages
- 11,072
- Reaction score
- 10,836
103? You have something against Carson Palmer, Percy?The only QB with over a 103 passer rating in 10 of the first 12 games of a season are Aaron Rodgers, Peyton Manning, and Dak Prescott.
103? You have something against Carson Palmer, Percy?The only QB with over a 103 passer rating in 10 of the first 12 games of a season are Aaron Rodgers, Peyton Manning, and Dak Prescott.
I know you wanted Wentz, so did I. I don't understand your constant criticism and lack of support for Dak. I mean, you are a Cowboys' fan right? Even if Dak isn't your first choice, or any choice at all, he has been quite impressive. You are right, his stats were not that impressive against the Vikings. But, what is impressive is his poise, his will, his composure, and his drive to succeed. He simply refuses to accept failure or defeat. Not only that, he is very smart with the football. He rarely makes bad decisions with it (by that, I mean throwing it where it can be potentially intercepted with high probability).
I was not a member of the Dakwagon.....but his play in the preseason convinced me to give him a chance and to even hop aboard. I have had a seat on that ride ever since.
This brings out the weaknesses in passer rating, and why one stat never tells the whole story. As you note, it doesn't include rushing. But it also doesn't iinclude sacks: he took 3 on about 25 dropbacks, which is a lot. It also doesn't include the two fumbles (one lost). If the lost fumble were an INT, his passer rating would plummet. (And no, I don't accept the argument that the fumble "wasn't his fault." First, he was holding the ball a long time all night, creating risk. Second, plenty of INTs "aren't the QBs fault," but they end up in the passer rating anyway.That's it.
Prescott had the 2nd highest passer rating of any QB vs. the Vikings this season.
And that QB rating doesn't take into account his accomplishments running the football.
Dak is on pace to throw for 3960 yards. (And I don't expect him to throw for very many in week 17).Dak is on pace to throw for more than 4000 yards. I believe Cam Newton and Winston are the only rookies to do that. Maybe one more like Luck.
We watched a super bowl go to Peyton M last Feb with not much more in passing yards............."rayne" key was to limit turnovers to the Minn Def, and avoid helping the hapless Minn offense.Check this out. Rayne's not a game manager because in the midst of his 139 yards passing he had a good drive.
I know you wanted Wentz, so did I. I don't understand your constant criticism and lack of support for Dak. I mean, you are a Cowboys' fan right? Even if Dak isn't your first choice, or any choice at all, he has been quite impressive. You are right, his stats were not that impressive against the Vikings. But, what is impressive is his poise, his will, his composure, and his drive to succeed. He simply refuses to accept failure or defeat. Not only that, he is very smart with the football. He rarely makes bad decisions with it (by that, I mean throwing it where it can be potentially intercepted with high probability).
I was not a member of the Dakwagon.....but his play in the preseason convinced me to give him a chance and to even hop aboard. I have had a seat on that ride ever since.
Yeah, I do wish he was more like Wentz, who had so many great drives on the way to 138 yards passing against the Vikings.Check this out. Rayne's not a game manager because in the midst of his 139 yards passing he had a good drive.
The fact that he's on pace for nearly 4,000 yards passing suggests he's not a game manager, but if you mean in this game only, his passing and rushing yardage accounted for two-thirds of our offense.
And we lose the game without that drive.
We watched a super bowl go to Peyton M last Feb with not much more in passing yards............."rayne" key was to limit turnovers to the Minn Def, and avoid helping the hapless Minn offense.
Yeah, I do wish he was more like Wentz, who had so many great drives on the way to 138 yards passing against the Vikings.
Like that first drive...oh wait, that was a 3-and-out. Okay, the second drive, where he...threw an interception. Or the third drive, where he...fumbled the ball away. Maybe the fourth drive, where he...threw an interception.
To be fair, Wentz also led a TD drive, and he only fumbled twice on that drive, so good for him!
I've already complimented him on his will, composure, drive to succeed and his intelligence. I've admitted being wrong on that. It's the skill set I still don't like.
Maybe your confusion comes from the idea that a fan must blindly support every player on the team and immediately squash any concerns they might have on a player once he's a Cowboy. That's not me. Never will be me.
Again, Romo ranked 17th in that category in 2014.He sits right now 18th in yards per game.
I think he has a great OL and skill position players and never plays catch-up, so he doesn't throw very much. He's third in the league in yards per attempt, which doesn't exactly scream game manager to me.4,000 yards sound nice until you realize it only puts him at best mid pack in the league. Or average. Or game managerish.
He sits right now 18th in yards per game. With a great OL and skill position players. Run that through your calculator and tell me what you think.
And againnnnnnnnn he's out lol.Again, Romo ranked 17th in that category in 2014.
Again, Romo ranked 17th in that category in 2014.
That's one way to look at it. Another is that he threw 2 interceptions and fumbled 3 times. While playing with a lead for most of the game. You're right; definitely not a game manager.So Carsus threw for one less yard with a worse OL, RBs, WRs and TEs?
Excellent but I don't need your help.