LovinItAll
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 1,766
- Reaction score
- 1,842
I wasn’t citing anything subjective, just his stats. He’s a good QB. No, he’s not an elite QB. There are only a handful of those in existence and we don’t have the ability to simply conjure one up. I’d love for him to take a team friendly deal, but I don’t expect him to and won’t get mad if he doesn’t. I’m not sure I would.That's a classic, if I close my eye's there's no issue. There are many decent subjective posts outlining why Dak being Very Good, may not be enough. It's not all his fault (though it could be argued that his last contract seriously restricted roster build......but he's (rightly) wanted money over success), but sometimes it's just not meant to be and at 30+, expecting a market setting contract and with an aging/injury ladened O-Line, it looks as if his opportunity is closing.
I’ve never believed that any QB bears the ultimate responsibility for winning or losing because it isn’t true. There are 21 other starters that have a job to do. It’s like when someone says, ‘WRSomeone was wide open! That QB is a hack.’ That open WR may have been his 4th read and the QB may not have had time to get to his 3rd read, much less his 4th. We don’t know. We aren’t in the QB room. We also don’t know what the coaches allow the players to do. In fact, we know very little about what any team’s internal structure is. It looks like the Panthers should’ve taken Stroud based on stats, but Young has ZERO time to operate the Panthers offense. No QB can succeed in the NFL surrounded by guys that can’t block.
Anyway, I roll with what we have. I don’t complain about it because I can’t change anything. I’m not going to be miserable over anything outside of my control. I think Dak can take the right team to a SB and win. Flacco did, along with a bunch of other QBs that were on the same level as Dak.