trickblue said:
I wink as I wish Ben... I know you have a problem with emoticons... but they are important to convey intent as the written word is devoid of emotion and intent...
Wink on!
If they are that big of a problem with you... they can be turned off to suit you...
I'll leave them on, they have their place on the forum, but it gets redundant sometimes. That's all I am saying.
Now... you REGULARLY down Henson... and you take shots at him all of the time as "unproven"... yet you champion Dustin Long... I have no problem with Long... if he is good enough... I hope he makes the team...
I mentioned Long one time as a possibility as a #3 guy.
Your disdain for Henson is unwarranted as you haven't given him a chance is my point... yet you want to give a D-1AA player a chance...
If my next door neighbor had the chance to play QB for my NFL
team, would I be obligated to give him a 'chance'? He's played about as much QB as Henson has ...
Your Q-love is in no way hidden from our posters, and therein lies your agenda... Q is gone... get over it... we didn't fail him... he failed us...
This agenda things cracks me up. I want my team to win. I want all of us fans to be able to rub **** in the Eagle, Commanders, Giants noses. I want victory for my TEAM. IMO Henson doesn't give use a good chance there.
Oh...and my love for Q?
Yeah, I liked him alright, but he wasn't anything special and I never claimed him to be great. As soon as he was gone I was shocked for a day or two and then rooted for Vinny and even saw an upside there.
Can't I like one guy and not care for another w/o having an agenda. Your accusations of this is baseless speculation.
This 'agenda' thing is nonsense to me.
While you make a valid point in regards to addictive personalities, Q chose his addictions to be drugs... Roger Staubach also has an addictive personality, he just channels it in different respects...
I too, have an addictive personality. I just hate seeing people spout things that they know absolutely nothing about. I'm not sticking up for QC because I think he was a great QB. It's about being educated on the subject. -i.e.- see D bairs post ... I just have a bone to pick with the high and mighty, my **** doesn't stink crowd.
The difference between many of us here is that although I want individuals to succeed that I like, I am not willing to forgo my "fandom" for a cause... I could care less whether we run a 3-4, 4-3, 46 or 11-0... I just want us to be successful...
I feel the same way. I want us to be successful. That means you and me both, Tricky Icky. I have no 'cause' other than team success and an abundance of victories for the Dallas Cowboys.
I really feel sorry for "fans" that, although enjoying the record we may have, would have a tinge of being PO'ed because their guy wasn't at the helm...
If Henson starts for any reason, I'll root for him. It (him starting) would lead me to believe he did something to deserve it. Though, I consider this highly doubtful and unlikely. It is a small possibility none-the-less. And I, personally, think it wouldn't be good for the
team.
If it turns out that I'm wrong, then I am wrong. I just think some fans need a reality check. QB starvation makes people do funny things.
:
I could give a rat's scrotum as to who starts at QB for us as long as he produces... that's because I am a fan of the team...
I want the best guy out there too. I just don't think it is, or will be Henson any time in the next few years.
While you would enjoy any success that Henson may provide for us as QB... you would be the first to scream "cut him" if he had a bad game...
I'm reasonable enough to give a QB more than one game...but thanks for painting the picture for me.
I am not like that as being a fan of the Cowboys is MUCH bigger than my like for a particular player... the team matters most... always has... always will with me...
Me too - although I do have a serious man-crush on Darren Woodson. That's something Woody's Girl and I have in common.
oh... and...
Are you flirting with me?