Quick Trey Lance Breakdown

Mac_MaloneV1 said:
He can't throw downfield. The fact that he's throwing picks short (which, to a degree is because he can't see downfield, like the first) is a problem lol.

I don't know what about that you disagree with
Click to expand...
He went downfield quite successfully on Sunday.

You're trying to diminish that by highlighting issues that had nothing to do with going downfield.
 
McKDaddy said:
Did you ever play sports? Any time you are in the real environment, it is better than any practice.

Who's to say he couldn't lead an epic comeback like Frank Reich?
Click to expand...
Yes, I played multiple sports. Fortunately for me I did not come off the bench in scrub time.

If you are a scrub, I would agree anytime is most likely developing time for you.

However, if Trance is a scrub he should not be on the roster. You are not going to develop into a starting NFL QB in scrub time.
 
There were times the other night when I was watching him live that I saw something that I've seen a 100 other times in the NFL.

Unfortunately most of those QBs don't make it in the NFL.
He focuses so hard in a tight situation, he doesn't see other jerseys besides his target and the defender on him.
It's difficult.
Hope for the best
 
Roadtrip635 said:
This is just a breakdown on one of Trey's INTs.

Click to expand...

Like I said , he scans one side and keeps trying that side, he is not looking at the other side, may be this is due to coaching ( DUMB IT DOWN n if not take off )
 
BlindFaith said:
Were you ever a QB or QB coach? In the NFL?
Im 50+++ years too and have seen my fair share of a lot of things. Most of them I would never to proclaim any sort of expertise on.

He definitely has NFL talent. The question is, can you correct his deficiencies. Accuracy being the most concerning and also the hardest to correct.
Click to expand...
I don't like to admit the 49ers are right on anything, but they nailed this one.
 
Kevinicus said:
He went downfield quite successfully on Sunday.

You're trying to diminish that by highlighting issues that had nothing to do with going downfield.
Click to expand...
He didn't, because he had 5 INTs and two fumbles lol

The actual point of the INT doesn't matter, especially when INT #1 was the direct result of missing the downfield receiver.
 
Mac_MaloneV1 said:
He didn't, because he had 5 INTs and two fumbles lol

The actual point of the INT doesn't matter, especially when INT #1 was the direct result of missing the downfield receiver.
Click to expand...
Your logic does not follow.
His ints does not negate the FACT that he did go down field on Saturday. It does not negate the FACT that he had quite a bit of success with it for the most part.
His INTS were not related to him going downfield, so you cannot relate the two.

You're trying to make a connection that is simply not there.
 
Kevinicus said:
Your logic does not follow.
His ints does not negate the FACT that he did go down field on Saturday. It does not negate the FACT that he had quite a bit of success with it for the most part.
His INTS were not related to him going downfield, so you cannot relate the two.

You're trying to make a connection that is simply not there.
Click to expand...
Was he more aggressive? Yes. Did he turn the ball over more? Yes.
 
Chasing6 said:
Yes, I played multiple sports. Fortunately for me I did not come off the bench in scrub time.

If you are a scrub, I would agree anytime is most likely developing time for you.

However, if Trance is a scrub he should not be on the roster. You are not going to develop into a starting NFL QB in scrub time.
Click to expand...
Kirk Cousins did.
 
Mac_MaloneV1 said:
and two fumbles
Click to expand...
why do you keep saying this? Did he fumble or were those team fumbles? I honestly don't remember him fumbling nor do I see it when I look at articles about his performance. As I said before though, I stopped watching with 8-10 minutes remaining.
 
Mac_MaloneV1 said:
Was he more aggressive? Yes. Did he turn the ball over more? Yes.
Click to expand...
But the turnovers were not a result of the aggressiveness, or going down field.
Therefore, they are not related and your attempts to link the two fall flat on their face.
 
McKDaddy said:
why do you keep saying this? Did he fumble or were those team fumbles? I honestly don't remember him fumbling nor do I see it when I look at articles about his performance. As I said before though, I stopped watching with 8-10 minutes remaining.
Click to expand...
He did have two fumbles, luckily we recovered both of them. One he simply dropped the ball on a shotgun snap, the snap was fine, he just dropped it. The other was on an RPO, he was trying to pull the ball back from the RB to keep and fumbled it.
 
Kevinicus said:
But the turnovers were not a result of the aggressiveness, or going down field.
Therefore, they are not related and your attempts to link the two fall flat on their face.
Click to expand...
Nope. INT #1, was the result of MISSING the open man downfield. INT #5 was a pure missed throw downfield.

You are way too stuck in the minutiae and not the overarching point.
 
Roadtrip635 said:
He did have two fumbles, luckily we recovered both of them. One he simply dropped the ball on a shotgun snap, the snap was fine, he just dropped it. The other was on an RPO, he was trying to pull the ball back from the RB to keep and fumbled it.
Click to expand...
right. they were not lost though.
 
Kevinicus said:
But the turnovers were not a result of the aggressiveness, or going down field.
Therefore, they are not related and your attempts to link the two fall flat on their face.
Click to expand...
They are worse. He just drop the ball for basically no reason at all.
 
Mac_MaloneV1 said:
Nope. INT #1, was the result of MISSING the open man downfield. INT #5 was a pure missed throw downfield.

You are way too stuck in the minutiae and not the overarching point.
Click to expand...
Missing the man downfield is not something that happens....WHEN YOU'RE GOING DOWNFIELD. That should be obvious to everyone.

What is the overarching point? That you're making arguments that make no sense at all?
 
Kevinicus said:
Missing the man downfield is not something that happens....WHEN YOU'RE GOING DOWNFIELD. That should be obvious to everyone.

What is the overarching point? That you're making arguments that make no sense at all?
Click to expand...
The problem is that he can't see and deliver to players downfield and it creates issues everywhere.

He missed, as in didn't see, the man downfield. If he did, he wouldn't have thrown the interception.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Staff online

Members online

... and 75 more.
Total: 7,018 (members: 175, guests: 6,843)

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
464,094
Messages
13,788,567
Members
23,772
Latest member
BAC2662
Back
Top