Rate the last movie you saw

MarionBarberThe4th

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,478
Reaction score
5,450
Tyson - 6/10

Im fascinated by Mike Tyson so it got my attention but how about a differing POV?

Like he made a good point about Holyfields headbutts, but Id love to see Holyfields take on the ear biting.

Great quote though- " Then I hooked up w/ this ******* Don King. That slimy, dirty, reptillian mother****er. Hed kill his own mother for a dollar"
 

CowboyWay

If Coach would have put me in, we'd a won State
Messages
4,445
Reaction score
554
Watched District 9 last night

1/10

Horrible
 

YosemiteSam

Unfriendly and Aloof!
Messages
45,858
Reaction score
22,194
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
This is for ChldsPlay and Maikeru-sama whom said Avatar sucked. And to all the critics that said Avatar would never make the money back.

SUCKERS! :laugh2:

LINK

'Avatar' soars into $1-billion territory


One of the riskiest movies of all times is now officially one of the most successful at the box office.

When "Avatar" opened, its solid but far from stellar results left 20th Century Fox uncertain about whether the $430 million that it and two financing partners had invested to produce and market the 3-D film would pay off.

Less than three weeks later, there's no doubt. Director James Cameron's science-fiction epic on Sunday became only the fifth movie in history to gross more than $1 billion worldwide and, by far, was the fastest to do so.

The first three days of 2010 were spectacular for the movie industry, a feat considering that no new movies opened Friday. Every film in the top 10 dropped less than 38% from the previous weekend; a drop of less than 40% usually is seen as a modest figure.

Three of last week's releases -- "Sherlock Holmes," "Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakquel" and "It's Complicated" -- continued to have strong box-office appeal, but "Nine" was unable to recover from its disastrous start.

Total receipts were up 50% from the first weekend last year, setting Hollywood off to a strong start after a year in which domestic ticket sales grew 10% and attendance rose nearly 6%, according to Hollywood.com.

Ticket sales for "Avatar" fell only 10% in the U.S. and Canada to a studio-estimated $68.3 million, the biggest-ever third-weekend take. It blew away the previous record of $45 million set by "Spider-Man" in 2002, even accounting for inflation.

With $352.1 million already in the bank from domestic theaters, "Avatar" is on track to end up with at least $450 million domestically and perhaps significantly more if declines stay modest.

But "Avatar" has been strongest overseas, where it grossed $133.5 million in 110 markets this weekend, bringing its total to $670.2 million. It is already the fourth-highest grossing movie internationally and soon is expected to become the second, surpassing the $752 million collected by "The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King."

"Avatar" already is the highest-grossing film ever in Russia, the fourth-highest in Spain and Australia, and the second-biggest U.S. movie ever in France, India and South Korea. It opens Monday in China, an increasingly lucrative market for effects-laden pictures.

Its only real competition in raking in more money than any film ever is Cameron's last film, "Titanic," which grossed $1.8 billion in 1997 and 1998. To beat that mark, "Avatar," which is currently at $1.03 billion, would have to keep generating big returns well into February or March.

Theaters with 3-D screens have accounted for about 75% of its returns in the U.S. and Canada and 59% to 88% in major foreign countries.

Ticket sales for Warner Bros.' re-imagining of "Sherlock Holmes," with Robert Downey Jr. in the starring role, dropped 38% in its second weekend, more than any other movie in the top 10. But with $38.4 million this weekend and a domestic total of $140.7 million, it's on solid ground given its $90-million production budget.

"Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakquel" slid 25% from its opening, collecting $36.6 million and bringing its total ticket sales since Dec. 23 to a healthy $157.4 million. Fox and New Regency spent $70 million to produce the family film.

Universal Pictures' romantic comedy "It's Complicated," starring Meryl Streep and Alec Baldwin, fell 15% in weekend receipts, bolstering director Nancy Meyers' reputation for making movies that play well for a long period of time. It grossed $18.7 million over the weekend and has collected a total of $59.1 million domestically. If declines stay small, Universal and Relativity Media should make good on the roughly $85 million they spent to make the movie.

The musical adaptation "Nine," which was financed by Weinstein Co. and Relativity, dropped only 22% from its Christmas Day opening in wide release. After a dismal start, however, its $4.3-million weekend leaves it with a total of just $14 million.

Several movies in the top 10 saw ticket sales increase this weekend, an unusual occurrence. Receipts for "The Blind Side" grew 10%, and "The Princess and the Frog" rose 11%.

But "Princess," Disney's first hand-drawn cartoon in five years, is at roughly the same domestic total after four weeks in wide release as such financially disappointing recent animated features from the studio as "Bolt" and "Meet the Robinsons."

Among movies playing on only a handful of screens, "The Imaginarium of Dr. Parnassus," directed by Terry Gilliam and starring Johnny Depp and the late Heath Ledger, took in a solid $130,817 at four theaters, bringing its total after two weeks to $348,677.
 

Maikeru-sama

Mick Green 58
Messages
14,548
Reaction score
6
Ultimately, you make movies to make money, so yes, mission accomplished in that regard but it doesn't prove that the movie was actually good.

Heck, Spiderman 3 made almost $900 million and that wasn't very good.

The movie was boring for the first half and the 2nd Half was only good because a lot of stuff got blown up and you saw it in 3D.
 

YosemiteSam

Unfriendly and Aloof!
Messages
45,858
Reaction score
22,194
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
Maikeru-sama;3197028 said:
Ultimately, you make movies to make money, so yes, mission accomplished in that regard but it doesn't prove that the movie was actually good.

Heck, Spiderman 3 made almost $900 million and that wasn't very good.

The movie was boring for the first half and the 2nd Half was only good because a lot of stuff got blown up and you saw it in 3D.

Hows your retaining wall in your front yard? :p:
 

JohnnyHopkins

This is a house of learned doctors
Messages
11,302
Reaction score
3,610
I just watched Inglorious Basterds on Blue Ray. Man, I really like that movie.
 

Temo

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,946
Reaction score
362
Maikeru-sama;3197028 said:
Ultimately, you make movies to make money, so yes, mission accomplished in that regard but it doesn't prove that the movie was actually good.

Nothing really "proves" any art is "good", it seems like a silly argument to make.
 

YosemiteSam

Unfriendly and Aloof!
Messages
45,858
Reaction score
22,194
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
Temo;3197501 said:
Nothing really "proves" any art is "good", it seems like a silly argument to make.

I think earning $1 billion dollars pretty much states that the movie DOES NOT suck as some people said. It says that they just have poor taste! :laugh2:
 

vta

The Proletariat
Messages
8,753
Reaction score
11
nyc;3197514 said:
I think earning $1 billion dollars pretty much states that the movie DOES NOT suck as some people said. It says that they just have poor taste! :laugh2:

I haven't seen Avatar, but I'm not too sure I'd hang my hat on sales figures to gauge quality. Spice Girls, Britney Spears, Backstreet Boys, big time sellers; low-grade musically.
 

YosemiteSam

Unfriendly and Aloof!
Messages
45,858
Reaction score
22,194
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
vta;3197534 said:
I haven't seen Avatar, but I'm not too sure I'd hang my hat on sales figures to gauge quality. Spice Girls, Britney Spears, Backstreet Boys, big time sellers; low-grade musically.

The people that bought and paid for those albums disagree with you. It's all opinion, but in the end. Dollar figures don't lie. Bad movies and bad music don't sell. These did. That makes you wrong even though you (and I when considering those musical acts) disagree.
 

Maikeru-sama

Mick Green 58
Messages
14,548
Reaction score
6
So if we go by ticket sales, that means Titanic is the greatest movie of all time?

Avatar was a classic "turn your brain off and see all the cool explosions" type of movie.

If you went to enjoy great CGI, then Avatar is great.

If you went to see interesting characters and a plot, then Avatar is probably not for you.
 

vta

The Proletariat
Messages
8,753
Reaction score
11
nyc;3197542 said:
The people that bought and paid for those albums disagree with you. It's all opinion, but in the end. Dollar figures don't lie. Bad movies and bad music don't sell. These did. That makes you wrong even though you (and I when considering those musical acts) disagree.

I'm not sure taste is the same as opinion anymore than convenient timing is the same as quality. The people that bought those things most likely will 'outgrow' them and look back with mixed feelings about them, realizing they may have been caught up in a fad, a moment or a grand marketing scheme.

Bad forms of entertainment certainly do sell at exponential rates. Dollar figures do not lie, they say a lot about the tastes of a large number of people or their susceptibility to get caught up in the hype of a new thing.
 
Top