John813
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 23,624
- Reaction score
- 36,563
Many Saints of Newark
6/10
My biggest gripe on the film was using Harold so damn much. I get the role he had in it, time frame of the US in the late 60's, and the actor did a good job in the role, but they really gave a lot of screen time to make him an antagonist, that lives, but never once is he mentioned in, "The Sopranos". Sure, the Sopranos is set in the late 90's early 2000's but you'd think for someone who played such a role back in the 70's and years afterwards, the Sopranos cast never mention him.
Felt like the major antagonist should of been a NY mob member or some screen time to a younger "Shah" who plays a neutral role but sees the disorganization of the DiMeco crime family.
Was cool to see James son play a younger Anthony, but to be honest I wanted more screen time to the younger main characters.
6/10
My biggest gripe on the film was using Harold so damn much. I get the role he had in it, time frame of the US in the late 60's, and the actor did a good job in the role, but they really gave a lot of screen time to make him an antagonist, that lives, but never once is he mentioned in, "The Sopranos". Sure, the Sopranos is set in the late 90's early 2000's but you'd think for someone who played such a role back in the 70's and years afterwards, the Sopranos cast never mention him.
Felt like the major antagonist should of been a NY mob member or some screen time to a younger "Shah" who plays a neutral role but sees the disorganization of the DiMeco crime family.
Was cool to see James son play a younger Anthony, but to be honest I wanted more screen time to the younger main characters.