And I'm sure you've noticed that the only thing that has kept us hope is our passing game. Romo HAS had weapons his entire time here, and he has always put them to good use. I'm talking about the other areas where we have been lacking in. I don't think Romo is a good enough QB to win with just his passing offense alone, he either needs a solid running game, or a defense that can create turn overs. And yes, of course a good coaching staff around him would do wonders. I'm afraid it might be too late to get those other pieces around him, though I guess time will tell. The clock is ticking though, tick, tock ...
If Romo misses a game this season, you guys are gonna be shocked at how much better we are w/o him.
The life of a Journeyman QB.....Enter Carson Palmer and Tony Romo....both are equals in about ever sense of what a QB is or should be,,,,they both are 33 years old,
That awesome defense you're referring to ranked 20th in 2011 and gave up over 40 points 4 times during the regular season and once in the playoffs. My gosh Denver gave up 49 points to GB and 2 weeks later gave up 45 to Detroit. They gave up back to back 40 point games in weeks 15 and 16 to NE AND Buffalo and you call that an "awesome" defense?
Of course his "teammates" are going to support him what do you expect them to say? For as many mistakes as he's made in crunch games I doubt everyone of his teammates believe he can get it done. They certainly won't admit it but other players such as Ahmad Bradshaw said he didn't think the team believes in him. Bradshaw said what many others think including myself. Romo is a talented QB but it's hard to believe in him with all the poor decisions he makes in critical situations.
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/11/ahmad-bradshaw-takes-a-shot-at-cowboys-tony-romo/
He has yet to show he can handle do or die pressure.
Yeah let's go with the guy who got benched in favor of Tebow and got kicked to the curb by KC....CHAMPIONSHIP!
Romo HAS proven he can go toe to toe with an elite QB in a shoot out, he's proven it before, and he also proved it last year against Drew Brees. The thing is though, even if Romo plays very good, we'll still need a big play by our defense to come out with a W against those teams. We definitely need to get Dez the ball though, because like you said he's our play maker, but if teams triple team him like the giants sometimes did, then I disagree. It'd be dumb to force into triple coverage with a HoF TE and one of the best #2 WRs in the NFL.The passing game is the only chance the Cowboys have their QB and receivers are the strength of the team. They haven't been able to run the ball consistently in years and with most teams airing it out it's going to be on Romo's shoulders to win games. He's going to be involved in several shootouts this season with Rivers, Peyton, Brees and Rodgers in the coming weeks. Romo isn't good enough to win with just passing he's too mistake prone but passing is the only thing this team can do well. You have to get the ball into the hands of the playmakers like Dez.
Lee definitely been a big disappointment, I'm afraid he might not be the same player in this scheme. I hear yah about our problems, time again they keep popping up, the same old stuff. It's very early this year so just maybe we can get the kinks worked out ... You know how that goes though.Defensively there's still issues stopping teams in the 4th quarter. We can't stop the pass or the run when games are on the line. Lee has looked lost in this defense and Ware came of the field with a neck burner last week which raises concern about his continuing neck issues. The clock is ticking and it's looking like it's going to run out on this team. The Cowboys had an entire offseason to try and correct some of the problems but we keep seeing them. It's very discouraging.
Plenty of QB's have played well enough throughout their mid-30's to achieve high levels of success and even win the Superbowl.
Unless you can see the future you have no idea if that contract extension was a "terrible idea" or not. None of us has any clue after 2 games what this season will bring.
And I'm pretty sure no one on this team gets "ripped to shreds" more than Romo.
We're paying Romo for what's he done
Romo has been pilloried for turning the ball over so now he is being super cautious with it. You can't have it both ways. You want him to take chances? Deal with the turnovers. You want him to protect the ball? Well, get ready for more FGs.
So you're basically saying he can either turn the ball over at an alarming rate or dink and dunk down the field? Why can't he make plays without turning the ball over twice a game?
Catch let's not jump the shark. He didn't get overpaid he got market value and if we hadn't of got it to him somebody else would've. Again I always ask three things about Romo.
Who else you got?
How do you justify starting over at the most important position to the other players?
Is his career written yet?
So he didn't light it up last week and missed a play. He could just as easily light it up this week and make a lot of plays.
I'm really tired of everybody talking about Romo being the best thing we've got and it's not so easy to get someone better. While Jerry's been blowing up Romo as the end-all-be-all, San Francisco drafted Colin Kaepernick in the second round, Seattle drafted Russell Wilson in the third round, and the Miami Dolphins drafted Ryan Tannehill in the first round two picks after the Cowboys picked Morris Claiborne. It's not like it's impossible to find a QB as good or better than Romo for a fraction of the cost.
No, the awesome defense I'm referring to is the defense that held 5 opponents to 13 points or less. They also held 7 different opponents to 17 points or less as well. That's the awesome defense I'm referring to, but go ahead and highlight those few games to try and validate your flawed point.
And that's a load of crap, I don't buy the "what do you expect them to say" nonsense. IF that were true, then why do we see current players come out anonymously and bad mouth their very own teammates. They may not say it with their name on the line, but if they felt that way they sure as heck would express those feelings anonymously. Also, the poor decisions are magnified because he's on such a crap team, so any mistake he does make are that much more crucial. His teammates also understand that he makes a lot more positive plays then negative ones, apparently some fans don't though.
Another load of crap statement I don't buy in. When a team is 3-5, that's considered do or die correct? 3-6 then you're most likely out of the playoffs, because you'd have to win out or go 6-1 to have a chance. Last year when we were 3-5, our QB led our team to a 5-1 stretch under "do or die pressure". All that stuff is just nonsense that fans and media make up, SMH.
I'm really tired of everybody talking about Romo being the best thing we've got and it's not so easy to get someone better. While Jerry's been blowing up Romo as the end-all-be-all, San Francisco drafted Colin Kaepernick in the second round, Seattle drafted Russell Wilson in the third round, and the Miami Dolphins drafted Ryan Tannehill in the first round two picks after the Cowboys picked Morris Claiborne. It's not like it's impossible to find a QB as good or better than Romo for a fraction of the cost.
So you're basically saying he can either turn the ball over at an alarming rate or dink and dunk down the field? Why can't he make plays without turning the ball over twice a game?
10-6
First rd. playoff defeat
So you're basically saying he can either turn the ball over at an alarming rate or dink and dunk down the field? Why can't he make plays without turning the ball over twice a game?