No? No to what? I was not talking about Jimmy Johnson. My post was about Jerry Jones and his 29-year stranglehold on the general managership of his franchise.
March 1994 (
link): “I could step out and hire Barry Switzer as coach of the Dallas Cowboys tomorrow and he’d do a better job than Jimmy. Hell, I could probably get Lou Holtz over here. I might just step out tomorrow and hire either one of them. I think there are five hundred people who could have coached this team to the Super Bowl. I really believe that. [Expletive],
I could have coached the hell out of this team!”
Who does that quote belong to? It wasn't Johnson's. That is the example of the mindset I was discussing. Again, the same narcissistic personality, triggered into firing a two-time defending Super Bowl head coach, has
never held himself accountable to an honest self-evaluation, pulled the trigger, and fired a now 27-year championship lacking performance of his general manager.
And please. Do not cite his own past words stating he should have fired himself for his subpar GM performance. Those are empty words since he never did.
When you arrive at the level of my post...I'll let you know.
My post that you attacked upon principal was on the false presenting in blaming that Jerry needed to give up his own ethics for the benefit of Dallas fans. No, the departing guilt was Jimmy's. He stabbed in the back ... the city of Dallas, the players that he had collected, and his own boss who only had set HIM up for success.
Departure was his own direction, which he left no doubt upon by applying to another team the week before the Super Bowl. That isn't a minor action by someone 'running' a team. It squeels lack of real ethics...no matter what excuse it is hid behind.
That Jerry knew that his team was in fact roster dominant, was not wrong in the least. He wasn't wrong or out of place to so state that fact. The team as well, had top shelf experience and were producing at top levels in the NFL That was the facts and it didn't take a Jerry Jones to be able to discern those very same facts.
To lead the team that had been forged, was independent of only being able to be led by Jimmy Johnson. That is just a wrong assumption by any fan heat seeking a target to place his own frustrations upon. Hey, Jerry was actually informed enough to make that observation as well as functional directions.
Jerry was very astute, when he sought the leadership for his team, then, from Barry Switzer. By the way, Barry had a stronger record of wins both at the Collegiate and NFL levels than did Jimmy Johnson. Fact.
No, Sir, I'm not looking the other way just to benefit Jimmy Johnson. That is called ethics. The team survived despite the turmoil and poorly shown morales that Jimmy added to that very picture. That is in the past now...but Jimmy wasn't the innocent part no matter how Jerry stated the status following that departure. I'll just leave the name calling for now, where it belongs. But I won't pander to a folk lore developed image as a substitute now.
As to strangle hold, does he or you own the team? Has he given the Head Coaches full control as to final decisions on team matters? The answer to that is yes he has given control to Head Coaches. Failure comes in many forms. You saying the 2009 Cowboys with Tony Romo wasn't in a realistic position to go all the way to the Super Bowl? The team was actually favored to do so. That isn't because of stupid Jerry nor is the current team missing a step because of Jerry...
Now, what does it sound like when Jimmy Johnson says: Yea, I screwed you Jerry, and all my players as well. That prideful? What were the exact words used by Jimmy Johnson to brow beat his own players on a jet following a win, to get HIS desired effect...now, what were those words as well?
Naw, leave both Jimmy and Jerry out of a present picture for fans and this team that is pretty darned good now, as well!