Rolando McClain suspended 10 games

Rogerthat12

DWAREZ
Messages
14,605
Reaction score
9,989
I think he plays better in the middle compared to the outside. I'm no scout but just seems he is more comfortable and actually makes "some" plays from the middle

He certainly can play the position but some here are ignorant of the actual size of most NFL MLB's in todays game.

You do not need to be huge 250-60 to make an impact in the middle, the passing games today need an MLB that can cover and move as well.
 

iceberg

rock music matters
Messages
34,404
Reaction score
7,932
How soon before Jerry and Co. begin singing the praises of some backup LBer, who "has made great strides in OTA's" like he is already doing with the DE's ......

likely today. tomorrow.

but since they do this at almost every position and every year, it's only a matter of convenience to THIS TIME say it's because of THIS cause you WANT it to be.

however, they still say that crap every year. but sure. what the heck. this year, it's for this reason.
 

cowboys2233

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,712
Reaction score
1,983
Trying to figure out how McClain is the RKG....but Hardy is NOT? If I am not mistaken...Garrett bragged about his relationship with Nick Saban...and how that relationship helped him attain valuable insight into the genius of McClain...which translated into him being a player we seemingly could not live without! Laughable!!!!!!!!

No, what's laughable is you blaming Garrett for what McClain did. Coach Garrett stood up for him and gave him a second chance. McClain threw it (and millions of dollars) away. Recognize that.
 

Aven8

Well-Known Member
Messages
29,125
Reaction score
45,973
That is why smart, calculated drafting is so important. The team relies on the unreliable and it is clearly an organizational initiative. Whether it is injury or suspension it makes no difference when all that matters is winning as many of the sixteen games that you can.

That's not our style. We've been trying to get great players on the cheap for years. We think our "system" can change things. It's a gambling philosophy. And what's scary is it's not just Jerry anymore, it appears Stephen has the same philosophy. Jaylon Smith might not ever smoke a joint, but he's got an injury. Gregory top 10 talent, but weed, Lee top 20 talent but injured, etc, etc, etc. Notice all the gambles always seem to be on the defensive side of the ball? Outside of lousy TE'S we select and I put that all on JG.
 

Alexander

What's it going to be then, eh?
Messages
62,482
Reaction score
67,294
That's not our style. We've been trying to get great players on the cheap for years. We think our "system" can change things. It's a gambling philosophy. And what's scary is it's not just Jerry anymore, it appears Stephen has the same philosophy. Jaylon Smith might not ever smoke a joint, but he's got an injury. Gregory top 10 talent, but weed, Lee top 20 talent but injured, etc, etc, etc. Notice all the gambles always seem to be on the defensive side of the ball? Outside of lousy TE'S we select and I put that all on JG.

I don't see why that should be the case. Ultimately, he might support or bring the concepts to the GM, but he does not make the decision to pull the trigger.
 

Irvin88_4life

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,509
Reaction score
26,396
He certainly can play the position but some here are ignorant of the actual size of most NFL MLB's in todays game.

You do not need to be huge 250-60 to make an impact in the middle, the passing games today need an MLB that can cover and move as well.

I agree with you. Size isn't everything, can they play is the question
 

DenCWBY

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,170
Reaction score
5,929
Mike Fisher: Cowboys' source: "Gotta cut him -- the only guy arguing against it is Jerry."

What a shame -- it's beyond a sad state of affairs when your owner/GM is the prime enabler of the lack of discipline on your team.

:hammer:
 

Alexander

What's it going to be then, eh?
Messages
62,482
Reaction score
67,294
Hopefully Jerry looses this argument. I would be shocked if McClain wears a star again.

I actually feel the opposite. I think Jones will hesitate to "give up" on what he strangely views as a "success".

Perhaps Stephen Jones will have to draw a diagram on a napkin again or something.
 

Joe Realist

No Kool-Aid here!
Messages
12,675
Reaction score
5,707
He should have been gone awhile ago.

Who was the genius I was debating here weeks ago about this? McClain's presence on this roster is a symptom of the cancer in our front office. He shouldn't be here. It's an absolute joke.

Probably the same dopes who think Jaylon Smith will play this year too
 

dfense

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,109
Reaction score
6,542
Make an example of him. Thats three defensive players doing drugs. Either theres a lack of respect for the organization or a serious lack of discipline. I already said previously, he was a no show to avoid a test. Someone needs to be made accountable at some point. He's his own worst enemy. So much for the "family time".
 

Bullflop

Cowboys Diehard
Messages
25,721
Reaction score
30,913
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
Wait, how can this be? I thought people were holding Garrett on the personnel decisions these days.

Since Jerry was mentioned as being the only one opposed to ditching McClain, I ran with it.
 

Alexander

What's it going to be then, eh?
Messages
62,482
Reaction score
67,294
Good blip from Joel Corry on the fiscal impact of suspensions in case anyone was curious:


All suspensions are without pay.

The actual cost of a suspension of the same length for two players with the same offense is usually different because of salary and contract structure. For example, a player suspended four games for performance enhancing drugs (PEDs) with a $1.7 million base salary costs twice as much as a player with the same PED suspension that has an $850,000 base salary. The first player will lose $400,000, or 4/17ths of his base salary. Whereas 4/17ths of the second player's base salary is $200,000.

The teams of the players will get a salary cap credit in the current season for the amount of the suspensions.

Other salary components can be at risk with suspensions. Teams can recoup the same proportion of the prorated amount of a player's signing bonus as he's losing in base salary. If the first player in the previous example had $1.275 million of signing bonus proration, he would be out an additional $300,000 because his team would also recover 4/17ths of the proration. The total cost of his suspension would be $700,000.

Teams are required under the collective bargaining agreement (CBA) to recoup signing bonuses for PED and substance-abuse suspensions.


Recapture is at the team's discretion for other contract breaches, such as holdouts (i.e., Kam Chancellor) and other types of suspensions. Unlike base salary, the cap credit will not begin until the following season with signing bonus that is recovered.


Roster, reporting and option bonuses can also be recouped but the standard under the CBA is different from signing bonuses. These types of bonuses are only forfeitable if a breach occurs in the contract year where money is earned. This means that a roster bonus in 2014 can't be recouped for a suspension taking place in 2015.
http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/agents-take-real-costs-behind-the-nfls-suspended-stars-of-2015/
 

NoLuv4Jerry

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,698
Reaction score
4,911
No, what's laughable is you blaming Garrett for what McClain did. Coach Garrett stood up for him and gave him a second chance. McClain threw it (and millions of dollars) away. Recognize that.

I am not blaming Garrett for what McClain did. I am laughing at this whole "it's a process"....we are looking for the "RKG" rhetoric. We cut people for not wearing ties on road trips. Yet we have "tolerated" McClain...and his multiple transgressions. McClain has had MORE than a second chance. We were told Hardy was not good for the lockeroom. But McClain...a complete no show....is excused so he can be closer to his kids. So not sure how THAT was ok for the lockeroom...but Hardy was not. This is what is laughable to me.
 
Top