There is no irony. Every Romo fan i see arguing in his favor are using logic, statistics, and sound reasoning to support their stance on who was better.
Dak fans are using playoff wins which is a team stat, but will be the first one to blame others as to why the Cowboys lost. Most of them in here wont blame Dak for the San Fran loss. They blamed kellen moore and Daks receivers
I have no problem blaming Dak
and those highlighted things because all are true. Romo fans tend to make it a sole problem being dak is the main reason. Hes played the QB position for 8 years with the same results is what i hear yet the same thing occured with Romo and its well they would have been 4-12 without him. Craytons fault, Miles lost it in the lights or Dez caught it. He had bad defenses or his Oline sucked. Romo had garrett etc. EXCUSES they are just like the ones I hear now for Dak
if you are going to put it all on dak or make him the main problem because he plays QB and gets paid alot then do the same for Romo. Its not about who is or was better they both were and are damn good QBs and both were flawed in different ways.
Their issue in my opinion is they play QB for the most polorizing franchise with huge legacy and they play in the jerry jones era someone who hasnt quite figured out how to succesfully navigate the salary cap era and put together a complete team. One QB still has a chance the other is history
the other issue is half our fans evaluate on emotion and are so championship starved they just want a scapegoat. Its hard to win in this league and im not sure our fanbase (myself included at times) are anything close to being experts on football evaluation.