Gator88
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 1,344
- Reaction score
- 1,365
That would also make as much sense, true.I thought he was saying he was going to make a pass at Suzie Kohlber.
That would also make as much sense, true.I thought he was saying he was going to make a pass at Suzie Kohlber.
We know he can see the future, apparently just not far enough to see them take the next step.
You're probably correct but I can sense a real hatred of Prescott in his response.
This looks like an Eli picture that was Photoshopped.Lol so embarrassing
Seems like everyone thinks it's obvious......but there are a lot of different opinions about what the "obvious" answer is. I do love irony.I'll PASS on that one.
Fairly obvious.
That describes 90% of the posts in this thread.There is a term for this @Risen Star. It’s called projection.
“the unconscious transfer of one's own desires or emotions to another person.”
Points and likes me likes...I think the Garrett explication was germane to the aforementioned..lolI believe the displayed profundity of yer' post is an extrapolation to that which was actually rendered in questioned response,,,
*I almost gave you the ol' " +1 point awarded fer " post
+1 point awarded fer' the casual interjection of asphalt paver operational nomenclature into a conversation pertaining to a politely declined questioned answer from an unquestionably Deity levelled former Q.B.That’s just, like, your opinion man.
We don’t know. He could want to flame Garrett. He could want to tactfully make some observations about a young QB and thought better of putting Dak in the spotlight. He could have had criticism of the offense or of Linehan he thought better about sharing when the guy is out of a job. He could think they need to add a few playmakers.
I’m sure he’s got a great answer, whatever it is. But you can’t just assume his no comment matches your own criticisms exactly and anyone who disagrees is Jerry or a homer.
I’ll set aside my usual screed on people thinking people who disagree about how to improve the team are homers by default. I might want to change more than you do right now and just wouldn’t include the HC. That doesn’t make me a homer. It might make me wrong (I’m not), but it doesn’t make me a homer.
But he did. He made it pretty easy to read between the lines. If Jerry were observant. Garrett's time is up.lol ... “I’ll pass on that one,” Romo said.
Sad, he doesn't have anything positive to say.
Bringing out your inner Sting for that one, huh?Might be a little hidden code by Romo I missed initially. He chose his words carefully and said "I'll pass on that one". He could have said no comment, I'd rather not answer that, next question, whatever.
Instead he chose "I'll pass" and I don't think it's a coincidence. Meaning in order to take the next step he would have to pass? .... the football? That kind of "I'll pass"? Is this the clever message he's sending?
I read you, Tony Romo, and I miss the living crap out of you. Every sack he takes. Every misread he makes. Every technique he breaks. Every misstep he takes. I'll be missing you.
...and then immediately threw an interception.
JK. I'm a big Romo fan.
+3 points are hereby expeditiously awarded ,fer the introduction of new found evidence ,of which is soundly assigning thereof an moore easily formulated insight into the THEADS " person of unanswered question's" suppressed TRUE OPINIONSkimmed the thread so may have missed it, but Moore was saying on the Ticket this afternoon that Romo was also asked about Kellen Moore, and David said he sort of hemmed and hawed for a second but ended up saying he's heard good things about Kellen but he doubted much would change because the head coach was the same.
Anyone still unclear about all this?
So, the coaches only call the defensive signals, alignments, personnel packages, stunts, blitzes, coverages etc... in the games the defense doesn’t play as well, and the players just wing it on their own in the games they do play well? I’m guessing most fans weren’t aware. It’s nice to finally have it explained.Yes. Our coaches brand of football can not help us. It can only harm when we have become predictable and a team has figured something out and we need to adjust.
You have to have the Green Hornet decoder ring to know for sure.Might be a little hidden code by Romo I missed initially. He chose his words carefully and said "I'll pass on that one". He could have said no comment, I'd rather not answer that, next question, whatever.
Instead he chose "I'll pass" and I don't think it's a coincidence. Meaning in order to take the next step he would have to pass? .... the football? That kind of "I'll pass"? Is this the clever message he's sending?
I read you, Tony Romo, and I miss the living crap out of you. Every sack he takes. Every misread he makes. Every technique he breaks. Every misstep he takes. I'll be missing you.
or both lolI put this in another thread, but it was meant for this one:
He could be wondering many things, but I'm going to guess he passed because it has to do with either the guy coaching the team, or the guy who replaced him.
There is a term for this @Risen Star. It’s called projection.
“the unconscious transfer of one's own desires or emotions to another person.”