Bleu Star
Bye Felicia!
- Messages
- 33,925
- Reaction score
- 19,920
I love you too.What a joke post. This is embarrassing.
I love you too.What a joke post. This is embarrassing.
Right. Try watching this Viking team dominate without an elite QB.Have you been watching other teams without defenses in all those games? Or do you just not care that it takes more than a QB to win a Superbowl?
Let's pretend like any other great QB in the history of this league hasn't had some of those same moments while we're at it. We'll also ignore the awful teams he's had around him and all of the stats that point to him being an elite level QB. It's funny how this is a team sport until it comes to Romo.So it's called hating on him?
I call it expressing my real emotions after stacking up a number of occasions over the years where I have gotten up and left the watering hole with my tail tucked due to yet another untimely turnover during clutch moment.
But let's just pretend like those things never happened.
It's also funny how every interception or ball batted out of his hands wasn't Romo's fault either. It had to be the WR's fault for running the wrong route and the ball's fault for running away from the comfy confines of his hands.Let's pretend like any other great QB in the history of this league hasn't had some of those same moments while we're at it. We'll also ignore the awful teams he's had around him and all of the stats that point to him being an elite level QB. It's funny how this is a team sport until it comes to Romo.
That will be the very last test for him. Dominated in preseason, has looked fantastic in actual NFL games, now if he shines against tougher teams.. that is it.I need to see Dak against Cincy & GB before any QB controversy.
I never said he wasn't competitive. If you make it to the NFL, conventional wisdom would say you have some fairly high level of competitive juice inside. However, being a leader of competitors is a whole different ball of wax. I consider him a passive leader... & if anyone would like to prove their claims that he's one of the most vocal members in the locker room with video I got all night. (well just an hour or so but that wouldn't have sounded as good).
Again, I have maintained that his body no longer does what his mind thinks it should be doing. He's past that stage in his career. But if we all want to pretend as though he's not another strange hit away from the whirlpool. Ok. Let's pretend.Since I'm not in the locker room I can't prove any thing. But if you listen to the players he's undoubtedly their leader. You don't gain that respect being passive. I have no doubt that Peyton was the leader of his teams or that Rodgers is the leader of the Pack. You don't see a whole lot of either of them doing any thing special on the sidelines of things aren't going right. Even Troy wasn't that vocal and he had to deal with some real passionate goofballs, Irvin being the goofiest.
Have you been watching other teams without defenses in all those games? Or do you just not care that it takes more than a QB to win a Superbowl?
Are you sure that wasn't Coach Jones?I can't remember the player but in 2012 one of our defenders proclaimed that if the offense can play like that we didn't need a defense. (some thing close to that) I was embarrassed for that player. But that has been the Romo era.
We've all missed that. But your targeting the wrong person. Yours Bulls Eye should be on Jerry not Romo.
Believe what you want. If someone hasn't figured it out by now, they're beyond the help of a message board post.It's also funny how every interception or ball batted out of his hands wasn't Romo's fault either. It had to be the WR's fault for running the wrong route and the ball's fault for running away from the comfy confines of his hands.
Again, I have maintained that his body no longer does what his mind thinks it should be doing. He's past that stage in his career. But if we all want to pretend as though he's not another strange hit away from the whirlpool. Ok. Let's pretend.
Are you sure that wasn't Coach Jones?
It's also funny how every interception or ball batted out of his hands wasn't Romo's fault either. It had to be the WR's fault for running the wrong route and the ball's fault for running away from the comfy confines of his hands.
I don't see any one giving Romo a pass here. But that don't change the fact that what surrounded him most of his career wasn't pitiful. Yet he was able to accomplish more than most would ever dream of.And don't forget it was a new, oil slicked balls fault that made him put it on the ground in the Seattle playoff game. Or the bad lights that made the ball get thrown right to the DB in the skin game a couple years later.
So it's called hating on him?
I call it expressing my real emotions after stacking up a number of occasions over the years where I have gotten up and left the watering hole with my tail tucked due to yet another untimely turnover during clutch moment.
But let's just pretend like those things never happened.