Cowboysheelsreds058
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 3,025
- Reaction score
- 2,320
Is this based on INTS thrown despite missing 5 games?
LLLOOOLLL, I knew it.
Is this based on INTS thrown despite missing 5 games?
.Who is Rosenthal?
All I gonna say is that all the good QBs in the NFC have reached the Superbowl at some point. That includes the following:
Stopped reading after "All I gonna say."Tom Brady - Tampa
Aaron Rodgers - Green Bay
Jared Goff - with Rams
Matt Stafford - Rams
Jimmy G - with Niners
Jalen Hurts - Eagles
I don't see Dak anywhere but I'm clueless.
Rodgers got to more Super Bowls than Dak.That's how you think football works?
How many Super Bowls did Aaron Rodgers get to?
Clueless Anti-Dakkers are the best.
You mock those you disagree with and call out their education.....all while using emojis? Think about that for a bit.Stopped reading after "All I gonna say."
You Anti-Dakkers are so well educated.
How could one even dare to disagree with you Rhodes Scholars???
He must’ve woke up wanting to rile the nation up lol.I'm sure this won't cause controversy
I think that’s based on reputation. Because everyone is infatuated with guys like Josh Allen, Burrow and Herbert…..Burrow I understand. He has the resume. If I’m being honest based on the playoffs last year? The three most impressive performances I saw came from NFC quarterbacks. Daniel Jones against the Vikings, Dak against the Buccs and Hurts against Chiefs.I disagree with the rankings but I don't feel like its a huge leap to say Dak is the best in the NFC right now either.
The problem with the rankings in the NFC is that their is just such a lack of quality QBs in the entire conference. I mean you could realistically put Jared Goff towards the top of the list too and I wouldnt argue. Put any of these guys on the AFC list and well.....not pretty.
Nailed it.I think that’s based on reputation. Because everyone is infatuated with guys like Josh Allen, Burrow and Herbert…..Burrow I understand. He has the resume. If I’m being honest based on the playoffs last year? The three most impressive performances I saw came from NFC quarterbacks. Daniel Jones against the Vikings, Dak against the Buccs and Hurts against Chiefs.
People love to overhype the AFC.
Probably based on 7 years vs. 1 year from Hurts. Lets see if Hurts keeps the same or improves or was a one hit wonder.What controversy? Any sane person realizes Dak is not the best QB in the NFC, especially coming off a season where he missed 5 games yet led the league in INT's and crapped the bed in the playoff game vs. SF.
I think 7 years vs. 1 year. Actually 2 years as Hurts 1st year as a full time starter was not great.Is this based on INTS thrown despite missing 5 games?
I think him and Purdy are both in for a rude awakening. Cause now teams have tape on them.Probably based on 7 years vs. 1 year from Hurts. Lets see if Hurts keeps the same or improves or was a one hit wonder.
So do any of the wrs or tes get any blame for the 9 ints that went thru their hands??I think 7 years vs. 1 year. Actually 2 years as Hurts 1st year as a full time starter was not great.
6 years years of decent consistency from Dak, then his bad INT's last season.
That is the only thing I can think of. Based on last year alone. Dak maybe #4 at best.
Of course they do.So do any of the wrs or tes get any blame for the 9 tipped ints?
And I get that there's more to it than just a pass and catch. There were times where dak threw into double coverage and got there only to have a wr or te get alligator arms. But sometimes you gotta make tough catches. Then there's the 3 ints from lamb not crossing in front of two lbers and a s.I think 7 years vs. 1 year. Actually 2 years as Hurts 1st year as a full time starter was not great.
6 years years of decent consistency from Dak, then his bad INT's last season.
That is the only thing I can think of. Based on last year alone. Dak maybe #4 at best.