Roy Williams not as bad after all

[Bob Sacamano]

I never said we should. I said that Fabini would make the roster. And he did.

And how is a backup comparable to a pro bowl left tackle?

OVER McQuistan

 

[theogt]

yeah you did, you said we should have kept Fabini's experience

No, I said that Parcells would keep him in 2006 because of his experience. And I was right.

 

[Bob Sacamano]

No, I said that Parcells would keep him in 2006 because of his experience. And I was right.

over McQ

 

[theogt]

OVER McQuistan

Over McQuistan or over Pettiti. I said he would make it over one of the two. And, once again, I was right.

And once again, I wasn't advocating for it. I was predicting it.

 

[Bob Sacamano]

Over McQuistan or over Pettiti. I said he would make it over one of the two. And, once again, I was right.

over both

 

[Bob Sacamano]

you also said Fabini should be a starter

but Fabini isn't starting anywhere, so that would make you

yep, you guessed it, WRONG lol

 

[theogt]

over both

No, obviously we were going to keep 2 of the 3.

you also said Fabini should be a starter

Over Colombo, because I didn't expect him to be as good as he was. No one did, really.

but Fabini isn't starting anywhere, so that would make you

yep, you guessed it, WRONG lol

Actually, he is starting in Washington. But I'm not sure what this has to do with anything at all.

 

[smarta5150]

This is about Roy Williams not our OLine.

get a room Theo and Summer.

 

[Bob Sacamano]

No, obviously we were going to keep 2 of the 3.

lol, no, you said that if it came down to either Fabini, McQ or Colombo, Fabini would be the one we would keep

you changed it to your current form because I deftly explained to you that BP was in absolute love w/ McQ

Over Colombo, because I didn't expect him to be as good as he was. No one did, really.



Actually, he is starting in Washington. But I'm not sure what this has to do with anything at all.

not much really, just debunking the myth that you're always right:

 

[Bob Sacamano]

This is about Roy Williams not our OLine.

get a room Theo and Summer.

meh, I stay out of Roy Williams arguments

but I never shy away from ones w/ theo lol

 

[smarta5150]

meh, I stay out of Roy Williams arguments

but I never shy away from ones w/ theo lol

You and Theo always butt heads lol

I usually sit back but I wanna get my post count up tonight :

 

[theogt]

lol, no, you said that if it came down to either Fabini, McQ or Colombo, Fabini would be the one we would keep

you changed it to your current form because I deftly explained to you that BP was in absolute love w/ McQ



not much really, just debunking the myth that you're always right:

All of the above is completely fabricated.

 

[Bob Sacamano]

All of the above is completely fabricated.

the only thing fabricated is the tall-tale that you're always right

 

[smarta5150]

the only thing fabricated is the tall-tale that you're always right

Easy guys, look at my avatar title... lets just say the mods gave me that nickname.

 

[Bob Sacamano]

Easy guys, look at my avatar title... lets just say the mods gave me that nickname.

way to diffuse the situation

I have no fighting spirit left

 

[AdamJT13]

If this is always the case, than how do you explain the following quote from Brain Stewart, when asked upon the same specific formation that deployed on the first series against the Jets:

If this is always the case, than how do you explain the following quote from Brain Stewart, when asked upon the same specific formation that deployed on the first series against the Jets:

"It's really just our base defense," Stewart said. "We keep everything the same up front. We're just trying to do a little better in coverage."
If they are thinking run, then why on earth would they be replacing Roy with Henry?

But this obviously isn't a knock on Roy, because Hamlin can just as easily be substituted with a CB.

If they are thinking run, then why on earth would they be replacing Roy with Henry?

In case the opponent does pass. But if we thought they obviously were going to pass, we would go to the 3-3, the dime or the nickel -- like we do in passing situations.

When you think the opponent IS going to pass -- such as on third-and-long -- you don't stick with the 3-4.

But this obviously isn't a knock on Roy, because Hamlin can just as easily be substituted with a CB.

As has been the case at times, according to Wade.

 

[DCfaninDC]

You're absolutely right. He's one of many underwhelming safeties in the league right now. It's like taking first prize in an ugly contest. That blue ribbon on your wall might look awfully nice, but at the end of the day, you're still ugly.

LOL...you are one funny dude. We need more posts like this one.

 

[odog422]

If this is always the case, than how do you explain the following quote from Brain Stewart, when asked upon the same specific formation that deployed on the first series against the Jets:



If they are thinking run, then why on earth would they be replacing Roy with Henry?

But this obviously isn't a knock on Roy, because Hamlin can just as easily be substituted with a CB.

We played the exact same formation later in the game with Roy over the top instead of Hamlin.

 

[JPM]

We played the exact same formation later in the game with Roy over the top instead of Hamlin.

Facts ! Damn you !

 

[aikemirv]

I really get amused by those who slam a player because of his draft position - like he had anything at all to do with the team picking him at that spot.

I am not saying Willimas is great in coverage but I do believe that the Cowboys knew going in at that pick that his strength was not being able to cover like a FS but more of a force at the line of scrimmage.