TwoDeep3
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 14,505
- Reaction score
- 17,337
Trust me...this isn't playing. I asked you a question and you don't have the answer. If you don't....that's fine. We can agree to disagree. But to play the "I'm gonna dodge the question and hope he forgets" type of game you are playing though? Let's be adults here.
I gave you the answer. I wanted them, to lose. How, I don't give a whit. I think the franchise would be better served with a more robust options in draft picks. I am not arguing. I am stating my preference. This is not a game. It is my opinion. Either accept it or not. Either way, doesn't matter to me. You act like you and i will actually resolve something. We won't. We are fans and that is the lowest rung on the ladder.
There is the small view and the big view. Small view sees something in a meaningless game If this were truly a game wherein you got something out of a win, then it should have been a win for the back-up QB. Not the starter, and the staring RB.
Big picture is the draft picks. While you differ in opinions, the way this could have fallen is moving up to 16. That adds four mote players to the selection.
Frankly, in the past there have been times I thought the franchise should lose games on purpose toward the end for the season to get a better draft pick. This is about Super Bowls for me. Not meaningless games. And Super Bowls come with play makers. And there is a higher propensity to find those guys closer to #1 over-all than later, even in the first.
We are done now.