FuzzyLumpkins;1591094 said:
Little was arrested for DUI previously to killing that lady by being very drunk and running a red light. After killing someone he was arrested for DUI again. Not only does he not care that he might kill people but he has killed people and still does the same thing.
He has only spent 90 days in jail and currently is on an NFL roster making a paycheck.
Michael Vick kills dogs.
He is looking at a year and a possible lifetime ban.
Hey if you want to clamor about animal cruelty more power to you but if you cannot understand how human life is more important i really do not know what to say. Youre value system at that point is so completely different than mine if that is the case.
um-fuzzbucket - didn't i say i didn't know all the facts? didn't i say i'd need to know more before i could say anything concrete? YET EVEN WITH THESE disclaimers people still put words in my mouth.
freaking amazing.
now - let me ask you this. if you find out a loved one died in an accident from a drunk driver - yes. you have every right to be upset and mad at that person for allowing themselves to be distracted while driving.
now what if the accident was because they were trying to dial a cell phone? is the death less painful? would there be less anger to a moron dialing a phone vs. driving?
i can see someone having an unintentional accident and needing to pay the price for that. if it happens again exponentially increase the penalty - i have no problem with that.
but vick wasn't drunk when he killed dogs. time and time and time and time and time again, was he?
i don't think you can compare the two because they're two different scenarios.
but like i said, are you less angry at someone on a cell phone vs. being drunk while driving who caused an accident?