Tuna Helper
Benched
- Messages
- 2,049
- Reaction score
- 0
Kilyin said:Jimmy didn't have that little inconvenience called a salary cap in 93 either.
I was referring to his play calling. He was a pure gambler. It was a fun brand of football.
Kilyin said:Jimmy didn't have that little inconvenience called a salary cap in 93 either.
Jarv said:More like Falcon-06 Saints- 03...
I have a 38 point lead in my FFL this week, my opposition has John Carney (NO kicker) and Ron Mexico...I want a low scoring game.
Not saying I like the crew. I liked the comment. Minor difference.Deep_Freeze said:This is the worse football crew since Dennis Miller. I don't like either one of them.
Mansta54 said:I can see that happening!!!
WoodysGirl said:But that said, you don't like women right now, so you prolly shouldn't respond to me anymore while watching your football. Wouldn't want to annoy you, ya know.
Da Hammer said:Kornheiser just said it, everything is going right for the Saints
I hope you know I was rolling the eyes at Hall, not at you. I just don't like anyone who has to constantly tell us how great he is, even if it's true. (And with Hall, it's not... At least, not yet.)31smackdown said:Yeah.. I'm just talking about the fact that he gets more press than any other corner in the league based on his "Deion-esque" self marketing.. Every week Hall creates a media story by challenging whatever reciever he is going against...
I just don't think Hall has established enough unanimous respect within the league to be making some of those comments.
..But I agree.. America needs to see him to judge for themselves
WoodysGirl said:Not saying I like the crew. I liked the comment. Minor difference.
But that said, you don't like women right now, so you prolly shouldn't respond to me anymore while watching your football. Wouldn't want to annoy you, ya know.
peplaw06 said:I haven't been watching the first half (Heroes premiere), but would there be any evidence to support the conspiracy theories we saw on the board this week?? I mean come on, a 20-3 lead for the Saints in the first half?? Forgive me if I'm a little skeptical.
peplaw06 said:I haven't been watching the first half (Heroes premiere), but would there be any evidence to support the conspiracy theories we saw on the board this week?? I mean come on, a 20-3 lead for the Saints in the first half?? Forgive me if I'm a little skeptical.
Chocolate Lab said:I hope you know I was rolling the eyes at Hall, not at you. I just don't like anyone who has to constantly tell us how great he is, even if it's true. (And with Hall, it's not... At least, not yet.)
31smackdown said:Bigger offseason addition for the Saints... Bush or Brees? ..
Right now I say Brees... he is managing the offense pretty well... If Brooks was still there they would be down 10-7.. at least.. it depends how many times Brooks would have thrown backwards..
Yep I feel real special...Deep_Freeze said:Hahaha, your an exception. Your a cowboy fan, so your cool, lol.
You should feel special, after all, I like you and my mom.....special company.
Tuna Helper said:Give the Saints some credit. They have been playing well for the past couple of weeks. Granted the competition was not as good as the Falcons.
I don't believe in NFL conspiracies, though I do believe that the refs are actually looking at the Vegas lines when they go under the hood for a replay review. I think the refs do try to keep the primetime games close. Look for a furious Falcons comeback in the second half.
peplaw06 said:Well I can't "give them credit," because I haven't been watching. That's just the first thing that popped into my head from flipping over to a blowout. I mean the Falcons have been running roughshod over two highly touted running defenses. Now the Saints and their swiss cheese defense comes in and basically shuts them out for a half??
A lot of whacky things have helped the saints. blocked punt for a TD, blocked FG.peplaw06 said:Well I can't "give them credit," because I haven't been watching. That's just the first thing that popped into my head from flipping over to a blowout. I mean the Falcons have been running roughshod over two highly touted running defenses. Now the Saints and their swiss cheese defense comes in and basically shuts them out for a half??
bigbadroy said:who is the saints reciever wearing #12?
peplaw06 said:Well I can't "give them credit," because I haven't been watching. That's just the first thing that popped into my head from flipping over to a blowout. I mean the Falcons have been running roughshod over two highly touted running defenses. Now the Saints and their swiss cheese defense comes in and basically shuts them out for a half??