Hostile said:
I have wondered for a long time if you are offended by Harleys. You bring it up constantly. Now that I know you ride a Ducati, I think I won't make an "issue" of it. Nice bikes BTW. Which model?
Okay, now I see. Its all good because I've got a bike
Lame
749
Hostile said:
Yet you had signatures of Heath Miller. Has he broken wind at Valley Ranch yet Charles? Hello hypocrisy.
Yeah I seem to remember making signatures with Heath Miller side by side Winslow Sr, Jackie Smith and Ozzie Newsome.
There's a big difference.
You compared Henson to HOF QBs in Troy and Staubach before he even broke a sweat.
I touted Heath Miller as a very good TE prospect and thought he'd be a good fit for our offense.
I was right on both accounts. he's performed admirably for the 2005 Champions and it appears I was ahead of curve in wanting a more versatile TE in Miller over Campbell..........a year prior to the drafting of Fasano.
As for the Henson comparison..........he so well spoken
Hostile said:
People get excited about prospects. Period. There's nothing deviant or illegal about that. The part of an outside conscience was played by an animated grasshopper.
I noticed you didn't denounce any of the Manny Lawson or Bobby Carpenter signatures. Do you not see how singling out one player to take notice of makes you look like you've got an agenda? Seriously?
Come on man, you're smarter than that and I know it. Step outside your skin for a minute and look at you through your own critical analyses of other people. Can you be honest enough to do that?
I didn't see any Bobby Carpenter or Manny Lawson pics next to a Lawrence Taylor, Huff, Nitschke or Singletary. I didn't that dumb level of excited.
I saw many posters evalaute Carpenters and Manny skills on the collegiate level and how they might be a good fit on out defense.
I didn't see anyone create a signature with either guy beside Chuch Howley or Hollywood Henderson (guys not in HOF). I would have called it dumb too.
I thought it was dumb period. I would have thought the same if Some poster did it with Julius, but atleast to this point Julius has shown flashes of greatness..........as for Henson.................
I am smart. Thank you
Hostile said:
I said essentially that having off field issues does not mean you will absolutely be a great WR. In other words the exact opposite of your math equation to start that post.
That was you interpretation of the post. Vintage and Skinsterp comprehended my post the way intended it to be understood
As point out to you by Vintage my math equation
/post wasn't meant to be an "absolute" one way or the other.
Hostile said:
I dunno. Don't really care. The fact is there are great NFL WRs who do not have off the field issues and having off the field issues doesn't make a WR great.
well duh!!!
If you got a clue that I was being humorous and exaggerating you wouldn't be preaching to the choir.
Hostile said:
Of course you did. I don't expect you to disagree with someone who agrees with you.
Vintage didn't agree with me.
He basically understood the point I was trying to get across........"isn't it eery how most talented WRs are bad boys or idiots off-field"....notice the exaggeration.........then I went on to bestow my ROY vote to Holmes.........slight humour
Hostile said:
No. It's a dumb stance regardless of the intent of "humor" that I still don't see. I've read it a couple of times. Just doesn't seem that funny to me. But hey, I didn't think Andrew Dice Clay was funny either and people laughed.
Your entitled to your opinion. I thought the Henson collages were dumb, you think my attempt at exaggeration and humour are dumb. Thats cool. I've been known to be dumb once in a while, never perfect nor caught up with the idea of trying to be the smartest football guy on the internet