Schultz = Witten 2.0?

hes nearly lost us the game thank goodness one fumble not reviewed the other tan early whistle to make 3 slivery white boy arms fumbles not so great,.i like Shultz but dang the man was seeing the football as hot potato today. he literally almost pulled a Pat Crayton today.he giveth and taketh away many plays..
 
he's neither big nor fast... he's not witten 2.0
hes schultz 1.0
but hysterical fans are gonna make him more and imaginary than what he is.

He's big because to be an NFL TE you kinda have to be. I said hes not so fast. He is also white. That's the trifecta. Witten 2.0
 
He's big because to be an NFL TE you kinda have to be. I said hes not so fast. He is also white. That's the trifecta. Witten 2.0

LOL..
tsk ,,tsk ..
even blake jarwin (260 lbs) is bigger than schultz who is just 244 lbs, but as ive said we have hysterical fans that are gonna make shultz into
more and imaginary than what he is.
:muttley:
 
  • Like
Reactions: BAT
I’m sure all the TEs out there that average 20-30 yards with no TDs are drawing the opponents best cover guys, right? Probably double coverage. Lol.

Production speaks volumes. Your posts speak to a closed mind blindly devoted to a narrative.

We've seen a 4 TD a year te core for 10 years running an exclusive 11 or 12 passing formation.

It's nice to see Schultz producing. He's more SERVICABLE than Swaim LMAO

I still don't think this team can beat anybody with this scheme

I still like to see more 4 wr sets and dual rbs formations with Schultz and Jarwin on the bench.

But Jerry and You are bound and determined that there must me a te on every play. And 2 at least 35% of the time on passing plays

We haven't won beans in 25 years with these checkdown tes who have amassed 1 playoff TD in 25 years might I add.

Ya see these tes take what the defense GIVES THEM. WHICH IS A BIG ZERO when it's a playoff caliber team or it's a game winning drive
 
Last edited:
he's neither big nor fast... he's not witten 2.0
hes schultz 1.0
but hysterical fans are gonna make him more and imaginary than what he is.
Especially omerv Aka Rogers he's been selling the te Koolaide for 7-8 years

Using words like SERVICEABLE lmao

If Not winning any playoff games means serviceable than I agree. Lmao
 
While somewhere in the Carolinas there is a forum talking about how the Panthers got robbed by the botched call by the Refs on the Schultz FUMBLE

One thing about Witten. He never really won anything for us but he didn't make alot of penalties turnovers and major mental mistakes.
 
He also saved the game on the last possession. 2nd and 9, he's wide open after the play action but Dak underthrew the ball and required a great effort to save the catch. If that's incomplete, it's 3rd and 9 with 2:00 left
 
  • Like
Reactions: BAT
Schultz had a good game. And got a nice lesson in ball protection. Hope he learned.
 
Hardly.......not even in the ball park. I like Schultz but he's no Witten. Witten in his prime was great. Some so easily forget. :facepalm:
 
Schultz is not deserving of being called Witten 2.0.
What should've been said is that Schultz has a Witten-like ability to get open in the seams. That's what's Witten-like, and maybe his hardnosed play and great attitude.
 
What should've been said is that Schultz has a Witten-like ability to get open in the seams. That's what's Witten-like, and maybe his hardnosed play and great attitude.
Jarwin and Schultz share the same attitude and which one has the reputation to be the Giant-killer? Who do we play next?
 
We've seen a 4 TD a year te core for 10 years running an exclusive 11 or 12 passing formation.

It's nice to see Schultz producing. He's more SERVICABLE than Swaim LMAO

I still don't think this team can beat anybody with this scheme

I still like to see more 4 wr sets and dual rbs formations with Schultz and Jarwin on the bench.

But Jerry and You are bound and determined that there must me a te on every play. And 2 at least 35% of the time on passing plays

We haven't won beans in 25 years with these checkdown tes who have amassed 1 playoff TD in 25 years might I add.

Ya see these tes take what the defense GIVES THEM. WHICH IS A BIG ZERO when it's a playoff caliber team or it's a game winning drive
You have a very simplistic view of football. I'm still convinced you get your football from video games.

Me and Jerry? Apparently you don't realize McCarthy has always used TE's, that all NFL teams use TE's extensively, whether they have A Travis Kelce level TE or not (ovviously far and away most teams don't(, and that Kellen Moore is given freedom to run the offense.

And, of course, the TE adds more blocking help than going without one, and clearly the running game has been a massive part of the team's success this year. You still don't grasp the basic concept that with a TE you still maintain an extra receiving threat while also having the playbook entirely open to run the ball however you may choose. It provides options that you simply don't grasp.

Finally, you've been talking a long time bout how the team using TE's has been a bad idea because they don't get enough production from the TE's, and now the team is getting that production you change the argument to the production doesn't mean anything.
 
Last edited:
You have a very simplistic view of football. I'm still convinced you get your football from video games.

Me and Jerry? Apparently you don't realize McCarthy has always used TE's, that all NFL teams use TE's extensively, whether they have A Travis Kelce level TE or not (ovviously far and away most teams don't(, and that Kellen Moore is given freedom to run the offense.

And, of course, the TE adds more blocking help than going without one, and clearly the running game has been a massive part of the team's success this year. You still don't grasp the basic concept that with a TE you still maintain an extra receiving threat while also having the playbook entirely open to run the ball however you may choose. It provides options that you simply don't grasp.

Finally, you've been talking a long time bout how the team using TE's has been a bad idea because they don't get enough production from the TE's, and now the team is getting that production you change the argument to the production doesn't mean anything.
The Last time I checked the offense dictates the coverage. And players cancel out players. You can't cover a wr or a rb with a linebacker generally. So a defense has to substitute with a db generally.

It's not a bad idea to use a te

But it's a bad idea to use 1 on 100% of the passing snaps and dual tes on 135% of the passing snaps when they don't have good skill sets.

We're not arguing the te position or what they do.

Were arguing the over the utilization by number of passing snaps counts.

These 2 tes are the worst skilled players on the team.

Most good coaches would be substituting alot more. Esp on 3rd and 16.

Were arguing that we'd like to see the better skilled players like pollard on the field on more occasions. Without these tes might I add.

We've had this argument about Beasley and you see the role he has in Buffalo.

They don't use a te on ever single play.

Why not go 4 wide or use some dual rbs formations. When did that become ignorant
 
The Last time I checked the offense dictates the coverage. And players cancel out players. You can't cover a wr or a rb with a linebacker generally. So a defense has to substitute with a db generally.

It's not a bad idea to use a te

But it's a bad idea to use 1 on 100% of the passing snaps and dual tes on 135% of the passing snaps when they don't have good skill sets.

We're not arguing the te position or what they do.

Were arguing the over the utilization by number of passing snaps counts.

These 2 tes are the worst skilled players on the team.

Most good coaches would be substituting alot more. Esp on 3rd and 16.

Were arguing that we'd like to see the better skilled players like pollard on the field on more occasions. Without these tes might I add.

We've had this argument about Beasley and you see the role he has in Buffalo.

They don't use a te on ever single play.

Why not go 4 wide or use some dual rbs formations. When did that become ignorant
Teams routinely use an extra DB anyway, so adding a WR and using a TE doesn't change that anyway. 70% of the Cowboys defensive snaps the last several years they only used 2 LBs and an extra DB.

You still don't seem to get that there is more to offensive football than having the fastest guys on the field. There is a system where, if things are coached right, everything syncs together with all the roles players are filling. It's much more intricate and detailed than just sending the fast guys out on routes. Aside from run blocking, TE's can also help with pass blocking - Steele would have had a much harder time against Bosa without some TE help. Even if not staying in to pass block, they can get a chip on the DE before running a route. A great ploy all teams use is having the TE chip then run go into his route after all the DB's have cleared out chasing the outside receivers … double benefit in slowing the pass rush and providing an extra receiver. And, clearly you miss the fact that sometimes we do use 4 WR's - when we go with an empty backfield. That provides 5 receiving options with the TE.

End of the day, sorry bud, the TE's are producing, the offense is rolling, and you do not know more than Kellen Moore, Mike McCarthy, and O-Coordinators all over the NFL.
 
Teams routinely use an extra DB anyway, so adding a WR and using a TE doesn't change that anyway. 70% of the Cowboys defensive snaps the last several years they only used 2 LBs and an extra DB.

You still don't seem to get that there is more to offensive football than having the fastest guys on the field. There is a system where, if things are coached right, everything syncs together with all the roles players are filling. It's much more intricate and detailed than just sending the fast guys out on routes. Aside from run blocking, TE's can also help with pass blocking - Steele would have had a much harder time against Bosa without some TE help. Even if not staying in to pass block, they can get a chip on the DE before running a route. A great ploy all teams use is having the TE chip then run go into his route after all the DB's have cleared out chasing the outside receivers … double benefit in slowing the pass rush and providing an extra receiver. And, clearly you miss the fact that sometimes we do use 4 WR's - when we go with an empty backfield. That provides 5 receiving options with the TE.

End of the day, sorry bud, the TE's are producing, the offense is rolling, and you do not know more than Kellen Moore, Mike McCarthy, and O-Coordinators all over the NFL.

Km and this coaching staff are puppets. This offensive scheme hasn't changed under this ownership and they've had how many coaches?????

It's been the same everydown te scheme outside of a dozen plays in 30 years. And these tes haven't been great going on forever. We'd had success using dual rbs or 4 wr sets on those plays btw.

There's nothing wrong with scaling back some snaps w these tes so fresh big play capable skilled players like Pollard, Brown, and Wilson can get more playing time. What's wrong w speed and big play capabilities btw?

The same goes for ex Beasley who had the highest open rate in the league for 2 years but still was used as a spot player on 3rd down.

Don't you think that the talent should override the scheme based upon the down and distance??? Because this coaching staff doesn't think so with their 3rd and 20 te formation w these checkdown tes

What's with the exclusive te mindset??? Maybe alot less monotony and having fresher tes might make the tes less prone to fumblitis. Lmao
 
Last edited:

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
474,017
Messages
14,506,891
Members
24,207
Latest member
TomGiantsfan
Back
Top