CowboysExchange
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 2,349
- Reaction score
- 557
Lets see if schultz can win it for us. Since its the Giants.
This is the key. I had him pegged wrong too. I thought he could do a little blocking and catch an occasional pass, but it never crossed my mind he could be a significant player. But in the absence of actual evidence from games, and without the team showing they believed it, how can a fan know?
Yeah schultz played like 30 + passing snaps and had 1 catch for 6 yards against a team w a losing record. Looks like yo messiah at checkdown te turned back into a pumkin again. 10 tds and 1000 yard projection. Right?
The giants olineman outplayed schultz on one passing play and schultz had like 30+ passing snaps. 1 catch for 6 yards is not an every snap player. Sorry but these tes are holding back the offense. He was in the slot the whole time (not blocking) with all that extraordinary blocking secret sauce. Lmao.
And Cooper had what - 2 catches for 20 something yards? So, let's bench him too. Hell, he can't even help our struggling backup OTs as a blocker, so what was the point of playing him?
Oh, but wait, I forgot you have no concept that is part of the TE's role. I forgot there are no points for that in fantasy football, so you wouldn't be aware.
Only a clueless poster with a ridiculous agenda would think being a good player means big production every week, and you pretending you have a point by cherry picking a single game after 3 straight very good games proves you are just such a poster.
Im not cherry picking anything. It doesnt take a rocket scientist to see that Noah brown is a better weapon than schultz on any down and distance. Much less on 3rd and long.And Cooper had what - 2 catches for 20 something yards? So, let's bench him too. Hell, he can't even help our struggling backup OTs as a blocker, so what was the point of playing him?
Oh, but wait, I forgot you have no concept that is part of the TE's role. I forgot there are no points for that in fantasy football, so you wouldn't be aware.
Only a clueless poster with a ridiculous agenda would think being a good player means big production every week, and you pretending you have a point by cherry picking a single game after 3 straight very good games proves you are just such a poster.
Sorry fantasy football boy, the team is one of the top scoring teams in the NFL despite undrafted backups at both OT spots, thanks in part to TE's that can help block and can run the underneath routes.We just barely beat the top 3 worst teams in the league. Lol. Cooper is a proven player. Ya boy schultz is a 3rd string te. One has gamechanging ability and one doesnt. Schultz is not a bonified option when youre marching down the field for the win. Swaim was just as good which isnt a compliment. Their Lb is always better than our te. Put their worst cover guy on our 4th wr and this team will go places. But they arent going anywhere with these scrub tes dominating passing snaps. The eyes dont lie. Hes one less receiver the defense has to cover because everybody on Gods Green Earth knows hes got no big play and scoring ability. Hes out there in the slot running routes like hes gonna make a gamechanging play on 3rd and 19 as a receiver. That is joke bro. Hes never made a single play and never will. Lmao. None of these checkdowners are worthy of playing every passing snap. Anybody that disagrees with the 4 wr formations on 3rd and 19 with the game on the line is a terrible strategist. We got better weapons than schultz.
Sorry fantasy football boy, the team is one of the top scoring teams in the NFL despite undrafted backups at both OT spots, thanks in part to TE's that can help block and can run the underneath routes.
But, again, if it isn't measurable in fantasy football, you don't grasp it. Still, FF measurables have been there in his other starts. and your eyes lit up on this one since the TE didn't catch many passes. That, my friend, is cherry picking.
Of course, your insistence is that the team's striuggles are all about the TE and not the fumbles, INT's and NFL's worst defense is pretty laughable too. That shows maybe the most ridiculously off base narrative on this site - maybe even more so than PAPPY'S narrative about Dak.
I've already shown you countless times that Schultz is not playing every snap other than maybe every snap on a running downs. He's playing about 70% of the offensive snaps, but that doesn't fit your narrative, so you cover your eyes and plug your ears like a child and pretend it isn't real.I dont disagree that the tes should have a role. Never have. Thats where your ignorant. Its an every passing snap role is where I have a problem.
The facts are we have better rb and wr threats. Its right there in black and white on a per snap basis bro. If you could comprehend the stat line on a per snap basis than you may have a point.
Schultz is not a hurry up offense candidate, a deep threat, a red zone threat, or a game changer. Lol.
Hes too mediocre to poor at getting open. Its 3rd and 19 and hes in the slot just like Escobar, swaim, jarwin, and the old washed up hofer was and they havent converted a 3rd and 19 going back to grade school but they play them anyways. All of them. Get a real weapon not a shield.
Noah brown came in and made a play as the 2nd/3rd wr. Put him in the 4th spot and it will give defenses fits
Be better off putting a 300 lb lineman out there versus these sorry tes. We not even running the ball effectively. Lol
I've already shown you countless times that Schultz is not playing every snap other than maybe every snap on a running downs. He's playing about 70% of the offensive snaps, but that doesn't fit your narrative, so you cover your eyes and plug your ears like a child and pretend it isn't real.
For that matter, even on the passing downs he does play he helps block some of the time, and other times at least chips the DE to help our undrafted backup OTs. But you don't grasp the TE can be used that way, so, as ususal, you ignore it
As for using a 300 lb lineman to block, that eliminates optionality. Shultz can block or go out on a route and defenses have to prepare for both, but a 300 lb lineman would only be there to block. You ignore this as well
You also ignore that every other team, even if their TE is not elite, use a TE on almost every down, and 2 TE's on some downs, and that as things are the Cowboys are the top passing team and 3rd highest scoring team in the NFL.
You tend to ignore a lot to push your fantasy football views.
Since Schultz isn't playing every down how do you know that 3rd and 19 isn't the kind of play he sits on.Thats not situational football. 3rd and 19 is a pure passing down. Schultz cant get it done so its one less player the defense has to cover. Thats why we very seldom ever do. He sucks. I dont care if hes blocking on passing plays because Hes a sorry receiver.
No winning teams have a scrub te out there in the 2 minute offense, red zone, or game winning drives if they dont have the skillsets to win those situational battles.
We never run more than 1-2 plays without a te on offense. Schultz and Bell are a liability in many situations
Its not fantasy football its situational football. Btw.
The only fantasy is thinking hes gonna make a play when it matters. The fantasy is in yo head because its never happened in 10 years
Show me some black n white stats where they did something and prove me wrong rogers. Lmao
Since Schultz isn't playing every down how do you know that 3rd and 19 isn't the kind of play he sits on.
Besides, how many 3rd and 19's are there in a game? Maybe 1 or 2? And of those how many are in situations where they just try to get enough yards to improve field position rather than risk a turnover against a defense geared toward not allowing 19 yards? So, maybe 1 play a game that fits your scenario, and even then we don't know that Schultz is on the field for that one play.
Hell, you just shot yourself in the foot describing a scenario that pretty much amounts to nothing.
Again, every team uses TE's most of the time, even if they don't have Kelse or Kittle or Ertz or Andrews, and, again, Schultz is not playing every down like you persistently claim despite proof to the contrary.
Face it, you are maintaining your fantasy football argument by denying facts and reality, and by showing a complete lack of understanding of what differentiates the TE position from a WR position.
Jared Cook has 166 yards and 2 TDs this season, and Schultz has 225 yards and 2 TDs, and you are upset we don’t have Cook and aren’t paying the higher salary - and somehow imagine you have an argument based on this? That further highlights how nonsensical your commentary is.Did ya just see Jared Cook hit on that 41 yard pass on 3rd and 14? Thats the guy i begged to pick up and you said no we should stick w the scrubs and stick with what we had. Lol. The guy catches 1 ball all nite at the most critical point in the game. Hes a winner because he can do it on paper.
You said how swaim was serviceable and hanna as a starter was good. And the ghost of 82's prime. And then Jarwin. Lol.
Your the everydown te koolaide salesman every year going back 7 years. Lol. They cant even win a playoff game if they even go. Lol.
You been talking coulda woulda shouldas for 6-7 years and every year these tes suck. Lmao.
Youre always wrong. This offense is not clutch. Its trash at the do or die or playoff level because they let these tes play every passing snap. They cant even beat a .500 team with a steak at every other skilled position. Lmao
Jared Cook has 166 yards and 2 TDs this season, and Schultz has 225 yards and 2 TDs, and you are upset we don’t have Cook and aren’t paying the higher salary - and somehow imagine you have an argument based on this? That further highlights how nonsensical your commentary is.
You also ignore teams have a salary cap to live under - another difference from your fantasy football world.
Sorry fantasy boy, but even aside from the facts you consistently ignore, and the stuff you regularly just flat out make up, now you are using examples of players that aren’t even doing as well as Schultz.
Dude, look around … we aren't paying Witten! Catch up to modern times. lolWe could have gotten cook for about what we paid witten. He singlehandedly ended our playoff run with a deep sideline pass and is a winner Lol.
Te is an anchor position on this scheme. We rotate all the other skilled players around them. But the 11 and 12 personnel is exclusive and these tes cant beat that monotony like a Jared Cook or Gronk or Jimmy Graham who are proven gamechangers who win games.
Cook didnt play for like 2 games so he hasnt played as many snaps this year and he is a winner on paper. Schultz has some production because of the firepower around him. But its not winning production against a good team or at any critical times.
Prevent defense stats are misleading. Js.
He got one catch for 6 yards against the Giants for Gods sakes but he played 70% of the snaps by your math.
Thats too much overinvolvement for a skilled player that has no sauce. They lined him up in the slot in the 4th quarter and he produced like the scrub receiver he is.
Cook is drawing a top defender or 2 and producing down the stretch and schultz always folds like a cheap suit. Lol.
Ya got nothing but theory and hype every year because the stats say he is the one who needs to go to the sideline on critical passing plays. Because he is void at producing the minimum benchmarks to play the snaps of a gamechanger.
Same argument we had about beasely being a spot player under these tes. You argued witten could do what beasely did statwise. Well yeah he can but it took three times as many passing snaps and none of that production was at critical moments or affected the outcome of the games.
The defense will give ya yards and receptions but they dont hand out scores and wins.
Js.
Let me educate you a bit - not that you will pull your head out and pay attention.Our receiving core is deadly and we need to concentrate on surrounding our offensive line around the passing game. That would be my focus, because with Lamb in the slot, we can do whatever we want. Zeke, I love, but if you have a strength on this team, you should cater to it.
I don’t think this offense will implodeToo bad his development is masked behind the stench of a possible implosion.
And Cooper had what - 2 catches for 20 something yards? So, let's bench him too. Hell, he can't even help our struggling backup OTs as a blocker, so what was the point of playing him?
Oh, but wait, I forgot you have no concept that is part of the TE's role. I forgot there are no points for that in fantasy football, so you wouldn't be aware.
Only a clueless poster with a ridiculous agenda would think being a good player means big production every week, and you pretending you have a point by cherry picking a single game after 3 straight very good games proves you are just such a poster.
He has definitely been a bright spot. Bell can play too.