Sensabaugh has visits lined up — 3:30 p.m.

Rampage;3301358 said:
wow....just don't even pay attention to the interceptions or forced fumbles. I mean it's not like angles have anything to do with those it's just "luck" like Theoght says:laugh2:
Just when I thought we couldn't get more inane. You've outdone yourself with this gem.
 
Bob Sacamano;3301360 said:
3 INTs in 2 years :lmao:
And the only argument to fall back on comes out again.

Fortunately, judging players involves more than just looking at a single stat line on NFL.com.

But thanks for trying.
 
CanuckCowboysFan;3301368 said:
please stop? would you. Stop with the not being targeted BS cause thats pathetic and thats the only excuse you can come up with. People have shown you stats, you've seen numbers, thats what it call comes down to. HAMLIN IS NOT A TOP SAFETY IN THIS LEAGUE, THE SOONER YOU REALIZE IT THE BETTER. JUST LOOK AT THE DAMN NUMBERS. Maybe you should take your time and read what I'm saying, cause clearly you have no effective comeback. Read my posts, take them all in, think about them, take in all the stats, and please, please, admit you're wrong.

It doesn't work any better when you basically take what theogt says, and then paraphrase it and say it back to him.
 
theogt;3301370 said:
And the only argument to fall back on comes out again.

Fortunately, judging players involves more than just looking at a single stat line on NFL.com.

But thanks for trying.

Fantasy Football :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead:
 
CanuckCowboysFan;3301368 said:
please stop? would you. Stop with the not being targeted BS cause thats pathetic and thats the only excuse you can come up with. People have shown you stats, you've seen numbers, thats what it call comes down to. HAMLIN IS NOT A TOP SAFETY IN THIS LEAGUE, THE SOONER YOU REALIZE IT THE BETTER. JUST LOOK AT THE DAMN NUMBERS. Maybe you should take your time and read what I'm saying, cause clearly you have no effective comeback. Read my posts, take them all in, think about them, take in all the stats, and please, please, admit you're wrong.
eh???
 
peplaw06;3301369 said:
Just when I thought we couldn't get more inane. You've outdone yourself with this gem.
yeah go ask Sharper,Reed,Atogwe and Polamalu about taking good angles. it actually puts them in position to make plays on the ball unlike Hamlin. but like Theo says and i'm sure you agree ints are "luck".
 
theogt;3301370 said:
And the only argument to fall back on comes out again.

Fortunately, judging players involves more than just looking at a single stat line on NFL.com.

But thanks for trying.

:laugh2:And what do you have? Coverage statistics that are irrelevant to the free safety position.
 
Rampage;3301379 said:
yeah go ask Sharper,Reed,Atogwe and Polamalu about taking good angles. it actually puts them in position to make plays on the ball unlike Hamlin. but like Theo says and i'm sure you agree ints are "luck".

hahahah yeah I really enjoyed reading that posts. Classic. ' INTs are luck'
 
Rampage;3301379 said:
yeah go ask Sharper,Reed,Atogwe and Polamalu about taking good angles. it actually puts them in position to make plays on the ball unlike Hamlin. but like Theo says and i'm sure you agree ints are "luck".

CanuckCowboysFan;3301384 said:
hahahah yeah I really enjoyed reading that posts. Classic. ' INTs are luck'

I've seen theo's ability to judge defensive backs.

He was against Tracy Porter.

Mike Jenkins.

For Antoine Cason LOL

Just fail all around.
 
Bob Sacamano;3301380 said:
:laugh2:And what do you have? Coverage statistics that are irrelevant to the free safety position.
Yup, those pesky coverage statistics that are "irrelevant" to judging players in coverage, apparently.

Good one.
 
theogt;3301389 said:
Yup, those pesky coverage statistics that are "irrelevant" to judging players in coverage, apparently.

Good one.

Everyone but FSs actually cover receivers.
 
Bob Sacamano;3301390 said:
Everyone but FSs actually cover receivers.

So if Free Safeties are preventing the deep threat in the zone, how do you expect them to post CB-like INT and PD numbers?
 
Rampage;3301379 said:
yeah go ask Sharper,Reed,Atogwe and Polamalu about taking good angles. it actually puts them in position to make plays on the ball unlike Hamlin. but like Theo says and i'm sure you agree ints are "luck".
So you're saying Hamlin doesn't have as many interceptions and forced fumbles because he takes bad angles???? Care to explain that?

And lol at putting OJ Atogwe on a list with three perennial All-pros.
 
casmith07;3301394 said:
So if Free Safeties are preventing the deep threat in the zone, how do you expect them to post CB-like INT and PD numbers?

I'd expect him to post more than 3 picks in 2 years. That's for damn sure.
 
Bob Sacamano;3301387 said:
I've seen theo's ability to judge defensive backs.

He was against Tracy Porter.

Mike Jenkins.

For Antoine Cason LOL

Just fail all around.

Antoine Cason is no slouch.

In fact, his career numbers are better than those of Tracy Porter.

Fail?
 
Bob Sacamano;3301398 said:
I'd expect him to post more than 3 picks in 2 years. That's for damn sure.

Then it is obvious that you have not a very good grasp on either what a free safety is supposed to do or how difficult it is to get interceptions playing football.
 
peplaw06;3301397 said:
So you're saying Hamlin doesn't have as many interceptions and forced fumbles because he takes bad angles???? Care to explain that?

And lol at putting OJ Atogwe on a list with three perennial All-pros.

:laugh1: he's the flavor of the week - blame Slatemosphere for putting his pic in his signature "Go Get Him, Jerry!!!11"
 
I think theo is practicing law by defending Hamlin even though he is guilty of suckieness.
 
CATCH17;3301407 said:
I think theo is practicing law by defending Hamlin even though he is guilty of suckieness.
I don't "defend" people in my practice.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
464,703
Messages
13,827,067
Members
23,781
Latest member
Vloh10
Back
Top