Separated at Birth: Russell Wilson and Tony Romo

[Section446]

So can posts by trolls.

So people that don't agree with your biases are "trolls"? Interesting concept, almost childish. Not overly surprising though, how old are you anyway, kid?

 

[TheRomoSexual]

So people that don't agree with your biases are "trolls"? Interesting concept, almost childish. Not overly surprising, how old are you anyway, kid?

You're the one on a Cowboys' board, using poor diction, claiming radical things without any substantive backing.

You're the one who proffered the idiotic notion -- how about you back it with any facts whatsoever.

 

[dstovall5]

To say Wilson is better then Romo is a huge stretch, to the point where it's laughable. Wilson isn't even in the same stratosphere as Romo. All Wilson is asked to do is drive the bus for the NFL's best defense with one of the best RBs in the game as well.

Fun stat for the bus driver. He has less ATTEMPTS per game then Romo has COMPLETIONS. Our fans crack me up.

 

[Zordon]

So can posts by trolls.

so season tix holders are trolls?

 

[Lifetimeboyzfan]

Disagree. He's only in his second season, and already Wilson is the superior player.

Are you high??

 

[TheRomoSexual]

so season tix holders are trolls?

I couldn't care less if they are season ticket holders. If a guy claims that Wilson is better than Romo on a Cowboys' board, yet doesn't have the testicular fortitude to back that claim up with actual facts, then he is a troll.

 

[RoyTheHammer]

I couldn't care less if they are season ticket holders. If a guy claims that Wilson is better than Romo on a Cowboys' board, yet doesn't have the testicular fortitude to back that claim up with actual facts, then he is a troll.

Testicular fortitude has nothing to do with it.. its a message board. Simmer down, naw.

 

[Section446]

You're the one on a Cowboys' board, using poor diction, claiming radical things without any substantive backing.

You're the one who proffered the idiotic notion -- how about you back it with any facts whatsoever.

Are you sure you know what the word "diction" stands for?

A life lesson that you should learn sooner rather than not; not everyone will agree with your opinions (something you should really grasp before you enter the business world). There's hardly anything "radical" being typed. You clearly think very highly of Romo, I do not. He's a 12-15 type QB in the league, nothing more.

 

[TheRomoSexual]

Testicular fortitude has nothing to do with it.. its a message board. Simmer down, naw.

Yeah, not interested in "simmering down." If you want to come on a Cowboys' board and claim that a second year QB is better than Romo, but better be ready to back it up.

 

[CowboyStar88]

still think we need an IQ test.....

Second that motion... Although I understand his premises and wasn't a knock on Romo... But the other poster who says he's already better is just crazy... Yes an IQ test is needed and maybe a Cowboys History lesson if you are going to become a member of this board. With all the Sean Lee is the dumbest player in the NFL and the Romo nonsense and the Twill is a bust after 4 quarters and Mo being the worst corner in the league I think we need some safeguards here. So IQ test and a History test of the Cowboys before you can become a member I propose! Whose with me?

 

[TheRomoSexual]

Are you sure you know what the word "diction" stands for?

A life lesson that you should learn sooner rather than not; not everyone will agree with your opinions (something you should really grasp before you enter the business world). There's hardly anything "radical" being typed. You clearly think very highly of Romo, I do not. He's a 12-15 type QB in the league, nothing more.

And, again, you present no facts to back up your opinion. What a sad existence.

Oh, and "diction" by definition means: "the choice and use of words and phrases in speech or writing." And you do not come off well in your "choice and use of words and phrases."

 

[Zordon]

I couldn't care less if they are season ticket holders. If a guy claims that Wilson is better than Romo on a Cowboys' board, yet doesn't have the testicular fortitude to back that claim up with actual facts, then he is a troll.

lets be real, someone named romosexual isn't going to react any differently whether proof/facts are provided are not.

 

[Section446]

Testicular fortitude has nothing to do with it.. its a message board. Simmer down, naw.

Eh, it's comical.

 

[RoyTheHammer]

Yeah, not interested in "simmering down." If you want to come on a Cowboys' board and claim that a second year QB is better than Romo, but better be ready to back it up.

Then how bout instead of calling him a "troll" and saying he "has no balls".. you simply ask why he thinks Wilson is better?

 

[TheRomoSexual]

lets be real, someone named romosexual isn't going to react any differently whether proof/facts are provided are not.

Let's be real "Zordon," everyone knows you're no less a troll at times.

 

[TheRomoSexual]

Then how bout instead of calling him a "troll" and saying he "has no balls".. you simply ask why he thinks Wilson is better?

I did, and look how he responds...with another declaration that Romo is a "12-15 QB." Of course, again, with nothing substantive.

 

[Section446]

Let's be real "Zordon," everyone knows you're no less a troll at times.

You're just all about the personal attacks, aren't you?

 

[Section446]

I did, and look how he responds...with another declaration that Romo is a "12-15 QB." Of course, again, with nothing substantive.

I can break it down for you all day, but there's no changing your mind. Your zealous approach to the topic shows that you clearly have no intention of listening to reason. You've got a lot of pent up anger, kid.

 

[TheRomoSexual]

You're just all about the personal attacks, aren't you?

And you're all about deflection without substance, aren't you? You're not exactly disproving your troll status.

 

[TheRomoSexual]

I can break it down for you all day, but there's no changing your mind. You're zealous approach to the topic shows that you clearly have no intention of listening to reason. You've got a lot of pent up anger, kid.

Just as I thought. Thank you for proving that you have no idea what you're talking about.

And it's "your." Good try though.