dupree89
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 9,356
- Reaction score
- 11,666
i smell a super bowl, dont you?Backwards visor and backwards baseball cap on the same staff?
i smell a super bowl, dont you?Backwards visor and backwards baseball cap on the same staff?
As a HC. As a DC, he was far better than Parker.Huh? Quinn is terrible.
Absolutely. Parker's a clown. He should team up with Eberflus.If the Commanders sack Quinn....... should we consider switching out Parker for him? Don't get me wrong, I am trying to be patient with Parker,but if we can bring back Quinn in some capacity, that might help our defence? He knew how to make our defence good.
Legit, if Washington sacks Quinn, the Cowboys may have won without playing today. If nothing else, him and Parker would make a great tag team. Quinn's specialty is dline. Parker is supposed to be good with secondary. Those two working together. We might be able to make our D much better quickly.
No. Even this site has to have a limit.If the Commanders sack Quinn....... should we consider switching out Parker for him? Don't get me wrong, I am trying to be patient with Parker,but if we can bring back Quinn in some capacity, that might help our defence? He knew how to make our defence good.
Legit, if Washington sacks Quinn, the Cowboys may have won without playing today. If nothing else, him and Parker would make a great tag team. Quinn's specialty is dline. Parker is supposed to be good with secondary. Those two working together. We might be able to make our D much better quickly.
Quinn can easily get a DC job. Why would he work under a youngster?Right, now imagine what he can do if he just has to focus on dline and pass rush, while Parker can handle the playcalling and secondary. All in all, Washington letting him go feeds him right into the hands of Jerry as a coach that Jerry likes, and we get to instantly have a chance to improve our D with someone that actually had it working for the most part here. Parker knows his job is on the line, so he wouldn't say no to Quinn coming in. Quinn would want to rebound, so he likely says yes. And Schotty gets Quinn back, which helps Schotty with the chemistry they can have back. It's an easy transition, and I think it works with the team. And giving Quinn Williams and Downs would be fun!
Being better than Parker is not hard.As a HC. As a DC, he was far better than Parker.
Of all the people we could hire, why would we want Dan Quinn? He couldn’t be successful with this group.
No.If the Commanders sack Quinn....... should we consider switching out Parker for him? Don't get me wrong, I am trying to be patient with Parker,but if we can bring back Quinn in some capacity, that might help our defence? He knew how to make our defence good.
Legit, if Washington sacks Quinn, the Cowboys may have won without playing today. If nothing else, him and Parker would make a great tag team. Quinn's specialty is dline. Parker is supposed to be good with secondary. Those two working together. We might be able to make our D much better quickly.
I don't think their schemes mesh, so the only way we could bring him back would be to give up on Parker, which I doubt we'd do right now.If the Commanders sack Quinn....... should we consider switching out Parker for him? Don't get me wrong, I am trying to be patient with Parker,but if we can bring back Quinn in some capacity, that might help our defence? He knew how to make our defence good.
Legit, if Washington sacks Quinn, the Cowboys may have won without playing today. If nothing else, him and Parker would make a great tag team. Quinn's specialty is dline. Parker is supposed to be good with secondary. Those two working together. We might be able to make our D much better quickly.
And Quinn would come here with HC experience.If the Commanders sack Quinn....... should we consider switching out Parker for him? Don't get me wrong, I am trying to be patient with Parker,but if we can bring back Quinn in some capacity, that might help our defence? He knew how to make our defence good.
Legit, if Washington sacks Quinn, the Cowboys may have won without playing today. If nothing else, him and Parker would make a great tag team. Quinn's specialty is dline. Parker is supposed to be good with secondary. Those two working together. We might be able to make our D much better quickly.
Yep. This is why so many Cowboys fans deserve their misery. They refuse to learn or understand the game. And they always want to run it back with past coaching failures. Quinn's defenses could not stop a noise bleed against the run.Hell NO! He’s a bum. We couldn’t win when he was here. He never stopped the run, ever.
If we ever bring in another DC, it must be someone with a proven track record who makes stopping the run the absolute #1 priority.
If memory serves me right, Landry in a critical game once thought he had a time-out when he didn’t. It was toward the end of his tenure.I don't know that it happened i've seen people call timeouts when you didn't have any Trying to get around the system but I've seen others forward even the NBA, When you're coaching in the moment and it's live and it's pressure sometimes you might have a little bit of Brainfart, It's known to happen to even better coaches and in bigger moments..
But doesn't matter that's a bad idea is that something that DQ get fired and available or are we talking about the end of this season route chris Parker this step needs time Get it done in house and then maybe some changes made after the season but right now no I see a big fat it's too soon too many injuries, joey Porter junior, hasnt got in sync,
I'm saying I've seen it all across sports i've seen it in basketball wasn't there a moment in basketball I can't remember it was college or the pros but it was a big game A championship game and somebody turned around and called the time out and they didn't have it and it cost them the game..If memory serves me right, Landry in a critical game once thought he had a time-out when he didn’t. It was toward the end of his tenure.
