TheMarathonContinues
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 83,499
- Reaction score
- 76,338
It’s all they have. Relying on a season that has been proven to be the anomaly.Still clinging to this nonsense?
It’s all they have. Relying on a season that has been proven to be the anomaly.Still clinging to this nonsense?
Oh good, doubling down on the nonsense because you don't have a legitimate point that you can articulate.Actually, all the picks were nonsense, is that what you are saying?
Even if you choose to believe he was bad last year Dak has shown he’s a good QB. Even his biggest doubters know that.I just responded to a statement. Dak has not "always been good" crap. Now, how about you go cling to something and don't answer for others, huh, Mac?
I was talking about last year, Mac. Now calm down and don't burst a blood vessel, Ok. Mac?Oh good, doubling down on the nonsense because you don't have a legitimate point that you can articulate.
How hard is it for you people to just say "I was wrong to think that the INTs were reflective of a Dak Prescott regression, especially considering his turnover worthy play rate last year." It is so easy. And you people just choose to keep pushing this garbage because you can't admit you're wrong. So dumb.
I agree, he is showing how good he can be this year and I hope he can keep it up, and I think he will.Even if you choose to believe he was bad last year Dak has shown he’s a good QB. Even his biggest doubters know that.
They don’t have the intestinal fortitude to admit they’re wrong. So they double down and look even more ridiculous if that’s possible.Oh good, doubling down on the nonsense because you don't have a legitimate point that you can articulate.
How hard is it for you people to just say "I was wrong to think that the INTs were reflective of a Dak Prescott regression, especially considering his turnover worthy play rate last year." It is so easy. And you people just choose to keep pushing this garbage because you can't admit you're wrong. So dumb.
I know what you were talking about. And it's nonsense to reference, because it was a dumb narrative last year.I was talking about last year, Mac. Now calm down and don't burst a blood vessel, Ok. Mac?
I was talking about last year, settle down, take a shot of booze and you will feel fine.They don’t have the intestinal fortitude to admit they’re wrong. So they double down and look even more ridiculous if that’s possible.
I stand by my post.I was talking about last year, settle down, take a shot of booze and you will feel fine.
You want the last word, Mac? You got it.I know what you were talking about. And it's nonsense to reference, because it was a dumb narrative last year.
Well, don't stand to long you might fall down. lolI stand by my post.
No, I want you to admit that the INT narrative is a stupid one.You want the last word, Mac? You got it.
No nads.Well, don't stand to long you might fall down. lol
What you want and what you get are two different things. I want you to shut up, how bout dat, Mac?No, I want you to admit that the INT narrative is a stupid one.
Of course, nice rebuttal. lolNo nads.
Be smart, and I will.What you want and what you get are two different things. I want you to shut up, how bout dat, Mac?
Can't do anything in the playoffs until the playoffs start. So it's best to enjoy what's in front of us which is coming to grips with the fact that our QB is playing the best football of anybody in the league and is thus the reason this team has a legit chance to make a deep playoff run!That's cute.
Now do it deep in the playoffs, and we'll all be on board.
I'm not sure that's true. I am pretty sure I heard or read that Dak has the fewest turnover worthy plays in the league this year but I could not swear to it. But I do know that last year there were analysts who said he was among the worst in that statistic. But the bottom line is Dak has never been a big turnover guy so one season which featured no less than 6 ricochet INTs can safely be discarded IMHO.Yes, he has always been good, and the INT total is nonsense because it ignores the fact that his turnover worthy play rate is basically the same now as it was last year.
I'm not answering for anyone else. I'm telling you that the INT narrative from last year is nonsense.
Yes but he also did last year, or very close to it.I'm not sure that's true. I am pretty sure I heard or read that Dak has the fewest turnover worthy plays in the league this year but I could not swear to it.
I don't know what he meant, same turnover rate as last year. It's not even close to last year.I'm not sure that's true. I am pretty sure I heard or read that Dak has the fewest turnover worthy plays in the league this year but I could not swear to it. But I do know that last year there were analysts who said he was among the worst in that statistic. But the bottom line is Dak has never been a big turnover guy so one season which featured no less than 6 ricochet INTs can safely be discarded IMHO.