YoungBuck
New Member
- Messages
- 205
- Reaction score
- 0
apickmans said:actually i think we have good depth at the RB, WR, DL, TE, LB, and CB position.
you don't even have good starters at some of those positions.
apickmans said:actually i think we have good depth at the RB, WR, DL, TE, LB, and CB position.
youngbuck said:you don't even have good starters at some of those positions.
apickmans said:really? Which ones?
youngbuck said:I'll just start with DE.
Daniels had a pretty good season with 8 sacks, but mane foreskin fans are acting like Andre Carter is the next great pass rushing DE. Hugely overrated.
He has one season with 12.5 sacks, then the next few seasons he had 6.5, 2, and 4.5 sacks.
Daniels is also widely inconsistant. 6 sacks, then 9, then 5.5, then 2.5, then 1, then 8.
I'm not too scared of the foreskin pass rush.
redskins1 said:PLEASE....dont worry about our backups...starters on starters Commanders win...get ready its coming!!!
apickmans said:actually i think we have good depth at the RB, WR, DL, TE, LB, and CB position.
tenken627 said:The Commanders defense shutdown the cowboys last year with pretty much that same pass rush.
skinsngibbs4life said:So at DL, TE, and CB are all not servicable for us? even though at each of those positions we have players that started on thier respective teams last year?
SkinsandTerps said:Depth. What a funny topic.
Tell me about the Cowboys depth.
Commanders have as much depth as the next team.
lspain1 said:I don't follow the skins closely, even though I find the Snyder FA and coaching approach to building a winner interesting. However, it sees to me that the most important depth question for the skins is at QB. Will Brunell make through this season and what happens if he falters? The Cowboys face a similar dilemma with Bledsoe (even though his durability is unquestioned) and thus the emphasis on Romo for the pre-season.
silverbear said:Spoken like a true Skins fan, that is, as a football fan who's pretty much clueless...
You guys got REAL lucky when it came to injuries last year, so you didn't need much depth... but iit appears you've forgotten how completely impotent the Skins' offense became when the offensive line finally suffered some injuries at the end of the season...
The way your team is currently constituted, you're screwed if you suffer even a "normal" number of injuries... but you Skins fans apparently think that seasons like last year are the way it will be year in and year out... well, this ol' Bear has been following football for 46 years now, and I can tell you that seasons like last year don't come along very often, for any team...
Not to wish disaster on you, but it would be freakin' funny to watch what happened if any Skins' starting offensive lineman suffered a season-ending injury in preseason, like Jon Jansen did two years ago... you guys would find out REAL quick the folly of ignoring the depth on your team, so that you can go out and buy a few expensive free agents and basically ignore the draft...
The Skins are committing a serious tactical error by blowing off the draft the way they have the last 2 years, and the lack of depth they now face is one consequence of that... since Gibbs has taken over, the Skins have had a total of 10 draft picks (14 would be "normal", and the Boys had 16 in that time)... of those 10 picks, 7 are still with the team... three are starters (Sean Taylor, Chris Cooley and Carlos Rogers), the other four really haven't had much of an impact on the team (Jason Campbell, Manuel White, Robert McCune and Jim Molinaro)... those 4 have combined for 19 games played, with zero starts...
For comparison, the Boys have had 16 picks in those 2 years, 14 of whom are still with the team, 4 of whom are starters... among the regular contributors are DeMarcus Ware, Marcus Spears, Kevin Burnett, Marion Barber, Chris Canty, Rob Petitti, Jay Ratliff, Julius Jones, Patrick Caryton, Jacques Reeves and Nathan Jones... that's a dozen contributors via the draft, compared to three for the Skins (4 if Campbell ever does get some playing time)...
Free agents COST more than draft picks do, leaving less cap room to build quality depth...
NOTE-- obviously, I have not factored in the draft picks from this year's draft, simply because none of us knows yet how any of them are gonna pan out... I'm just talking about the draft picks who have had a chance to earn playing time, i.e., the picks from the 04 and 05 drafts...
You've got to love the [lack of] logic in posts like these.Gfunk said:ya'll are still trying to find a starting 5 when we've had all 5 in place
where do you get off calling out our depth, let alone our o-line?
Out of morbid curiosity I ask this.Gfunk said:ya'll are still trying to find a starting 5 when we've had all 5 in place
where do you get off calling out our depth, let alone our o-line?
tenken627 said:The Commanders defense shutdown the cowboys last year with pretty much that same pass rush.
Vintage said:You've got to love the [lack of] logic in posts like these.
So bec. our OL isn't great, it somehow takes away from the post/leaves us with no credibility concerning your lack of depth?
Laughable.
I guess I shouldn't be surprised by your posts/what you say anymore. I should just be astonished with the fact that you know how to work a computer.