PA Cowboy Fan
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 24,774
- Reaction score
- 50,171
Not if we have to tag Dak.He won’t walk regardless. He will be tagged if a deal isn’t worked out.
Not if we have to tag Dak.He won’t walk regardless. He will be tagged if a deal isn’t worked out.
Paxton Lynch says hello.Neither
Draft a QB in the first
Cooper seems OK with playing out his deal.
I assume Dak would be too.
Elliott? He can be a knucklehead so who knows that he's thinking.
Frankly, I have no problems with the Cowboys doing just that.
Lol! I can see these three playing tag. Zeke tags Dak and Dak running after Cooper! Tag, you're it!Not if we have to tag Dak.
They saw what happened with D-Law, and it'll happen again.
Contracts always go up. What seemed like an "overpayment" a year ago is now considered ok the year after and 2 years later it's a steal.
It's like the rising house prices but without the fear of defaulting on your loan.
Say Dak wants 32 mil this year but the Cowboys are stuck on 30.5mil, for example. He goes out and has a good year, posts better numbers etc... He isn't going to accept 32 mil in 2020, and may want closer to 34-35, especially since Mahomes will be eligible for an extension in 2020 and he'll definitely reset the market.
Who in the hell exactly are you going to replace Dak with? Cooper? White? Come on man.
Yeah and Elliot is wanting record setting money. Dak is asking for wentz money. I would pay Dak first. Elliot has to come down to earth a bit. It’s a huge drop off from 1 to 2 RB, gurly makes 14.3 and the next highest is like 8 million.EzE is just being absurd. He's making $13 million over the next two years. While his QB is making $700k a year.
Paxton Lynch says hello.
It boggles my mind that you guys want to get rid of a franchise QB so they can draft one next year in the first. Lynch is who they tried to get, you think Lynch is better than Dak? If so you are a fool
Not if we have to tag Dak.
True.EzE is just being absurd. He's making $13 million over the next two years. While his QB is making $700k a year.
The thing is that the FO is sold on Dak. They aren’t waiting to see if he improves.I don't know. But you don't overpay for a QB (or any player for that matter) because you don't have an option at this time. That's a dumb way to do business.
It's like paying $50K for a 10 year old BMW 3 series because there isn't a new one on the lot at that time.
Paxton Lynch says hello.
It boggles my mind that you guys want to get rid of a franchise QB so they can draft one next year in the first. Lynch is who they tried to get, you think Lynch is better than Dak? If so you are a fool
The thing is that the FO is sold on Dak. They aren’t waiting to see if he improves.
They aren’t asking him to prove it. Really not any of the 3. Elliot won’t sign a 1 year prove it deal. None of them will.If people don't think he's proven himself yet as a franchise QB, why does it boggle your mind?
If the Cowboys have the option of seeing him play more before handing over a big contract, it's the prudent business move to do that. Signing a guy to a huge contract because you have no other options at QB is really a dumb business decision. Because what if Dak goes out and plays more like a 15th ranked QB instead of a Top 5 QB and you are paying him $34MM a year?
That's a sure fire way to basically screw yourself for the next 5-6 years.
Versus having these 3 in the top 5 paid at their position when only 1 is in the top 5?It's a dangerous gamble if they do.....
I agreeThey aren’t asking him to prove it. Really not any of the 3. Elliot won’t sign a 1 year prove it deal. None of them will.