big dog cowboy said:If we'd had even a decent K, we'd have made the playoffs.
Cortez missed a makable FG in that game Moss hit his home run against us. The final score should have been 16-14. The Denver game ring a bell? Another game lost because a kicker missed. We could have been 11-5.dbair1967 said:probably not...the team was in position to win games vs the Commanders and Seahawks and didnt because the defense blew it...the kicker wasnt on the field when Santana Moss caught two long tds, nor was he on the field when we let a team with none of their top WR's go 80+ yds to tie the game
David
big dog cowboy said:Cortez missed a makable FG in that game Moss hit his home run against us. The final score should have been 16-14. The Denver game ring a bell? Another game lost because a kicker missed. We could have been 11-5.
dbair1967 said:so what? whats to say the defense wouldnt have blown those leads too?
come on...13-0 with 4mins or so to go and the other etam hasnt scored a TD in 7+ quarters, and you give up two on the same damn play? and that after they had them in 3rd and 27...also, we were down 14-13 with around a minute and a half or so to go and the ball on the Skins side of the field...guess what, their defense held us without a single first down...they WON the game, whereas our defense LOST the game
and lest you forget, KC missed a gimme fg that would have tied the game too...and to think we had them down to 22 seconds and they had to go the length of the field...guess what, they did
quit blaming the freaking kicker
David
McNeill looks pretty good. He's ten times the athlete of Petitti, better size and strength, and 50 times the talent. Hasnt given up a sack in years, 6'8 and still runs a 5.08 and is athletic.MichaelWinicki said:Here is what Ourlads recently offered on perhaps the 3 top offensive tackles available... The analysis came after watching the players at the Senior Bowl-- both in practice and in the game itself:
D'Brickashaw Ferguson (Virginia)- As good as advertised. Excellent feet in pass protection. Good redirect. Long arms (36 1/4") natural knee bender. Smooth and athletic in his movement. Leaks through on the second level. Sinks his hips. Can turn and seal linebacker and cut off backside pursuit. One of the most fluid natural athletes we've observed in numerous Senior Bowls. Carries his weight well. Needs to fill out and upgrade his overall strength. Competitive blocker with god body control. Has all the tools to be a Pro Bowl player. Needs to post up inside leg better to take away inside slant by defensive end.
Eric Winston (Miami)- Angular left tackle that is more finesse than powerful. Comes off the ball with a flat back. Sustains contact with defender. Not real strong with his anchor. Has some talent and tools. Not an explosive and powerful as you like for a tackle.
Marcus McNeill (Auburn)- A left tackle with natural strength. Explosive. Can generate power. Will duck his head on pass protection and waist bend at times. Needs pass protection technique work. Raw talent.
Jonathan Scott (Texas)- Athletic tackle that needs to play strong. Not a powerful player. Good initial quickness and balance. An inconsistent player in both pass protection and run blocking. Players too high to anchor bull rush. Average long snap at 14 yards was between .70 and .79.
Ryan O'Callaghan (California)- Big physical right tackle type. Good sized hands and arms (33 3/4"). Good balance. Could improve his footwork in pass protection. Not a natural knee bender. Average athletic ability. Can mirror a speed rusher.
Jeremy Trueblood (Boston College)- Typical Boston College lineman. Physical and plays with an attitude. Angular build (6077, 316) with long arms (34") and big hands (10 3/8"). Plays high and allows the defensive end to get into him. Struggles to anchor. Inconsistent to move his feet against a speed rusher.
Other than Ferguson I don't see any instant answers at RT. As a matter of fact I think if one stuck Winston and McNeil at RT for the 2006 season I think each is capable of giving up 10+ sacks as a starter. I still think a year #2 Pettiti is a better option than either McNeil or Winston.
lord knows a 1st rd talent who hasnt given up a sack in years of college, couldnt perform better than a fat lop we got in the 6th round, who was fat out of shape unathletic and weak. no, of course that couldnt happen. all draftees are equal.MichaelWinicki said:AND who says either of those OT's selected at #18 would perform any better? At least in year one...
Hiero said:McNeill looks pretty good. He's ten times the athlete of Petitti, better size and strength, and 50 times the talent. Hasnt given up a sack in years, 6'8 and still runs a 5.08 and is athletic.
MichaelWinicki said:And has a questionable back...
No thanks.
neosapien23 said:Didn't he just have MRIs done? Let the trainers give the thumbs up or down. If the scouts say no, like they did with Rogers than we should pass. If they say he is healthy, McNeil is definitely worth the 18th pick. With is great workout, he might have just shot up his draft stock. Buffalo might draft him to replace Mike Williams.
MichaelWinicki said:If we take a OT in the first round I'll snap.
dbair1967 said:no, but I wasnt expecting him to be a human turnstyle either
san Diego started a 7th rd pick as a rookie at RT all of 2004 and their offense wasn eons better than ours...he didnt hold his team hostage with poor play
Pettiti got worse as the yr wore on, far worse...if he was capable of being good he should have improved...I'm sure he is a great guy and he appears to really try hard, but he isnt good enough to be an every game, every yr starter
David
neosapien23 said:Why? Aren't you tired of the revolving doors at both tackle positions? A talented tackle is not a reach at 18. McNeil will not be there in the second. If Flozell goes down again, our season will be done. We already spent a first and second on the linebackers. Let Burnett start at ILB next year.
If Petitti has to start another year and give up the most sacks in the league and help blow our chance at the playoffs etc. I will snap. What is the big deal with fixing our HORRIBLE HORRIBLE Oline? Why are people so opposed to it.MichaelWinicki said:If we take a OT in the first round I'll snap.
lol ya we all know how bright the future is for Tucker, Columbo and Rogers. They're all garbage. Tucker is even worse than Petitti. Fabini is another old overpaid free agent, something we don't know. When will people learn that expensive past their prime free agents just don't work out that much.MichaelWinicki said:IF, IF, IF, IF, IF, IF...
I wish we could have all-pros backing up all-pros at all positions.
But it ain't going to happen. Roster and cap limitations forbid it.
Right now Adams is guaranteed a roster spot. Petti is probably 90%. That's two spots left over for Tucker, Columbo and Rogers.
And if Fabini or another vet comes in I would almost guarantee they'll have a spot.
That's one spot left.
IF we sign a vet we will not draft a tackle period. A guard? Maybe in rounds 2 or 3... but no tackle.
Hiero said:If Petitti has to start another year and give up the most sacks in the league and help blow our chance at the playoffs etc. I will snap. What is the big deal with fixing our HORRIBLE HORRIBLE Oline? Why are people so opposed to it.
Hiero said:If Petitti has to start another year and give up the most sacks in the league and help blow our chance at the playoffs etc. I will snap. What is the big deal with fixing our HORRIBLE HORRIBLE Oline? Why are people so opposed to it.
MichaelWinicki said:Well if Hillary runs for president in '08 and wins I'll snap at that one too! LOL!
![]()
neosapien23 said:I think we are the only two people on the board that want McNeil with the 18th pick.