starfan1
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 13,444
- Reaction score
- 12,554
Wow I didn’t know thatNot at all. "/s" means sarcasm.
Wow I didn’t know thatNot at all. "/s" means sarcasm.
No need ....... it was a vague reference.I’ll apologize. Had no idea of his reference.
sorry, I haven’t. My apologies to you. i Thought you were telling me to stop posting on the subject. Again, I apologize to you, Zrinkill.It was a joke ....... you must not watch archer
Clutch and tough as a fistful of nails.You know who you are. Troy Aikman was a legendary quarterback and he was one of the best! Enough of this bull. You youngsters have no idea what you missed with that man. He was a true Cowboy and the recent attack on his reputation is asinine. Sit down and go watch some of his highlights and how clutch he was in the postseason. Do it and your mind might be changed!
You knew it, and I did too, but, obviously, not everyone does.Wow I didn’t know that
No actually I didn’t but I do now thank youYou knew it, and I did too, but, obviously, not everyone does.
Hey it happens to us all, especially since Zrinkill couldn't post the whole line. It might not be your type of humor but you should look it up, it really was a pretty big compliment to your post, just with a bit of adult humor mixed in for emphasis.I’ll apologize. Had no idea of his reference.
No worries. I regularly have to google Internet acronyms that I don't understand.No actually I didn’t but I do now thank you
I'm 57....am considered a youngster?Youngster call out thread. Nice.
some opinions are so stupid that they deserve no respect
Aikman was a stud, but Roger, hands down. IMOTo say he wasn’t an elite QB is saying you didn’t see him play. I would take him over any QB in Cowboys history with the possible exception of Staubach…I’d have to give that one more thought.
Why do you need to annoy him?I’m too young to have even seen Aikman play, but I’m going to call him a system QB to annoy OP.
They each had different strengths and I keep waffling back and forth between the two. I do believe that Roger was more feared in his era than Troy in his. It’s like deciding between one pound of gold vs 16 ounces of gold…neither is a bad choice.Aikman was a stud, but Roger, hands down. IMO
I mean, it’s hard to differentiate between eras and I believe posters are more inclined to stick with the Cowboys out of personal preference/bias. I personally think those units were just as talented. The Raiders had only 1 title due to the Steelers, the Hogs won 3 titles with 3 different QBs, Those Broncos lines could make any RB look good. And those Chiefs lines were just a beauty to behold, but they didn’t have the surrounding cast to have sustained success.Well, start a thread and see if people agree with you that these OLs were better than the Cowboys OL. Sounds like a good thread to me. I would be curious to see the responses at this site.
People are stupid and plenty around here who don’t understandYou know who you are. Troy Aikman was a legendary quarterback and he was one of the best! Enough of this bull. You youngsters have no idea what you missed with that man. He was a true Cowboy and the recent attack on his reputation is asinine. Sit down and go watch some of his highlights and how clutch he was in the postseason. Do it and your mind might be changed!